Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.
- Presentation
When to Consider UBA1 Testing in VEXAS Syndrome: Clinical, Serologic, and Pathologic Clues
Description
The talk outlined when to consider UBA1 testing for VEXAS syndrome, emphasizing a pattern of clues that should raise suspicion: older age, especially men over 50; recurrent fevers and high inflammatory markers; macrocytic anemia or other cytopenias; steroid dependence or poor response to typical steroid-sparing agents; and multi-system inflammatory disease involving skin, cartilage, lungs, joints, eyes, or thrombosis. Dermatologic clues included neutrophilic dermatoses, tender nodules, histiocytoid Sweet syndrome, vasculitic lesions, chondritis, and occasionally lupus-like or tumid lupus histology. Bone marrow vacuolization in myeloid and erythroid precursors was highlighted as a classic but not fully sensitive or specific finding, and skin or marrow biopsies can be useful. The speaker reviewed that UBA1 testing can be done by peripheral blood, bone marrow, or skin biopsy using NGS, digital droplet PCR, or Sanger sequencing, noting that more sensitive methods are preferred when suspicion is high and that many centers now include UBA1 on myeloid malignancy panels. She also stressed that women can be affected, though less commonly, and that VEXAS-like inflammatory syndromes may also be driven by other clonal mutations, so broader testing may be needed when UBA1 is negative but clinical suspicion remains high.
View moreConclusions
- VEXAS syndrome should be suspected primarily in older men, but women can also be affected, especially in contexts such as X-chromosome loss or other clonal hematologic disease.
- The strongest clinical triggers for UBA1 testing are recurrent inflammatory features such as fever, chondritis, neutrophilic skin disease, vasculitis, pulmonary involvement, and steroid dependence.
- Concurrent or evolving multi-morphology disease, especially combinations of chondritis, vasculitis, and neutrophilic dermatosis, greatly increases suspicion for VEXAS.
- Hematologic abnormalities are major clues, particularly macrocytic anemia, cytopenias, monocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, and coexisting myelodysplastic syndrome or plasma cell disorders.
- Elevated inflammatory markers, especially CRP, support the diagnosis, while ESR is less specific in the setting of hematologic abnormalities.
- Bone marrow vacuolization is a classic supportive finding but is neither fully sensitive nor specific, so a negative marrow does not exclude VEXAS.
- Dermatopathology can be highly suggestive when it shows neutrophilic dermatosis, histiocytoid Sweet syndrome, leukocytoclasia, vasculitic changes, or lupus-like/mucinous patterns in the right clinical setting.
- Treatment resistance to typical steroid-sparing agents is a major practical clue, because many VEXAS patients remain corticosteroid dependent despite standard therapies.
- Thrombosis, especially unprovoked venous thrombosis in the setting of autoinflammation or dysplasia, should heighten suspicion for VEXAS.
- Genetic confirmation is usually sought with UBA1 testing from peripheral blood or bone marrow, with higher-sensitivity methods preferred when clone size is small.
- Negative first-line testing does not fully exclude the diagnosis, and broader sequencing should be pursued when clinical suspicion remains high.
- Some patients who look like VEXAS but are UBA1-negative may instead have other clonal myeloid disorders, such as IDH-mutated neoplasms, that produce a VEXAS-like inflammatory syndrome.
- Overall, the presentation argues for a low threshold to test selected patients with adult-onset, multisystem, steroid-refractory inflammation and hematologic abnormalities, especially older men.
- Corty RW, Brogan J, Byram K, Springer J, Grayson PC, Bick AG. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024;76(6):942-948.
- Nicholson LT, Cowen EW, Beck D, Ferrada M, Madigan LM. JID Innov. 2024;4(1):100242.
- Sakuma M, Tanimura A, Yasui S, et al. Rheumatology. 2021;60(10):e356-e359.
- Beck DB, Ferrada MA, Sikora KA, et al. New England Journal of Medicine, 2020.
- Vitale A, Caggiano V, Bimonte A, et al. Intern Emerg Med. 2023;18(3):711.
- Beck DB, Ferrada MA, Sikora KA, et al. N Engl J Med. 2020;NEJMoa2026834.
- Oo TM, Koay JTJ, Lee SF, Lee SMS, Lim XR, Fan BE. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2021.
- Groarke EM, Duluu-Florea AE, Kanthi Y. Seminars in Hematology. 2021;58(4):230.
- Koster MJ, Kourelis T, Reichard KK, et al. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2021;96(10):2653.
- Obiorah IE, Patel BA, Groarke EM, et al. Blood Advances. 2021.
- Ferrada MA, Sikora KA, Luo Y, et al. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2021;73(10):1886.
- Hines AS, Koster MJ, Bock AR, et al. Rheumatology. 2023;62(12):3947.
- Tan IJ, Ferrada MA, Ahmad S, et al. JAMA Dermatol. 2024;160(8):822.
- Ribereau-Gayon E, Heiblig M, Bourbon E, et al. Int J Dermatology. Published online 2021:ijd.15916.
- Khitri MY, Guedon AF, Georgin-Lavialle S, et al. RMD Open. 2022;8(2):e002255.
- Mekinian AM, Georgin-Lavaille S, Ferrada MA, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. Published online August 11, 2025. doi:10.1002/art.43287.#10.1002/art.43287