Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.

  • Presentation

Using Dermatology MVP to Rediscover Purpose and Joy Through Highly Adoptable Improvement

Description

The speaker argues that dermatology improvement projects can restore purpose and joy when they are highly adoptable: focused on work that matters to the team and designed to reduce burden rather than add it. Using examples from their department, they show how a psoriatic arthritis screening project succeeded by choosing a short, validated tool (PEST), embedding it in the EHR, and making it easy for patients to complete ahead of visits, which increased validated screening use and was viewed positively by both dermatologists and rheumatologists without reducing referrals. They then describe a more ambitious access project to reduce low-risk skin checks by creating an EHR-based decision tool for scheduling follow-ups based on melanoma history, non-melanoma skin cancer risk, or baseline melanoma risk, using guidelines and literature to justify practical thresholds. This tool was fast to use, generally accepted, and modestly improved new-patient access. The talk concludes that quality improvement can bring teams together, improve camaraderie and control, and ultimately increase meaning, purpose, and joy in work.

View more

Conclusions

  • Highly adoptable improvement works best when projects are both important to clinicians and designed to reduce, rather than add to, workload.
  • A simplified, EHR-integrated PEST screening workflow increased validated psoriatic arthritis screening, was viewed as easier by clinicians, and did not reduce referrals.
  • Embedding screening before visits and into notes can make care more efficient while improving confidence in appropriate rheumatology referral for psoriasis patients.
  • Reducing low-risk skin checks through a decision-support tool can improve access to dermatology without compromising care.
  • A structured skin cancer risk assessment can help clinicians avoid unnecessary follow-up for low-risk patients and reserve visits for those with greater need.
  • The dermatology access tool increased new-patient volume modestly, suggesting that fewer low-risk follow-ups can free capacity for patients needing care.
  • Clinicians generally accepted the skin-check reduction tool as reasonable, fast to use, and helpful for making more informed scheduling decisions.
  • Outcome measures such as treatment response, patient-reported quality of life, and itch severity can be simplified and incorporated into routine workflows.
  • Quality improvement projects can create purpose, camaraderie, and a greater sense of control, making joy in work a byproduct of better care processes.
  • Hayes, C. Strategies to Ensure that QI Improves Joy in Work. IHI 2020.
  • Gladman DD et al., Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(12).
  • Haroon M et al., Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(6).
  • Raychaudhuri SP et al., Journal of Autoimmunity, 2017.
  • Coates LC et al., British Journal of Dermatology, 2013.
  • NCCN guideline page for cutaneous melanoma, version 2.2025.
  • A Model to Predict the Risk of Keratinocyte Carcinomas.
  • Swerlick RA, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Aug;85(2):510-512.
  • Yosipovitch G, et al. Br J Dermatol. 2019 Oct;181(4):761-769.
  • Kimball AB, et al. Br J Dermatol. 2016 Jul;175(1):157-62.