Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.

  • Presentation

Updated International Urticaria Guidelines: Diagnosis, Assessment, and New Treatment Recommendations

Description

The speaker presents the updated international urticaria guidelines, explaining that they are a rigorous, evidence-based S3 guideline developed by hundreds of delegates from many societies and countries through pre-voting, consensus discussion, and transparent published methods. The talk clarifies how recommendations are graded as strong or weak, for or against, and whether they are based on evidence or expert consensus. For diagnosis, the guideline recommends limited routine testing in chronic spontaneous urticaria and further evaluation guided by history and exam, emphasizing the “seven C’s” approach to uncover differential diagnoses. Disease activity, impact, and control should be monitored with tools such as the Urticaria Activity Score and Urticaria Control Test; an app can help patients track these measures. Treatment begins with second-generation antihistamines, including dose escalation when needed, while avoiding switching among different antihistamines or exceeding fourfold doses without evidence. Omalizumab remains the standard next step for antihistamine-refractory patients, and the guideline now also includes dupilumab and remibrutinib as second-line options, with choice influenced by comorbidities and other factors. Long-term systemic corticosteroids are strongly discouraged, and the overall goal is complete control with no signs and symptoms.

View more

Conclusions

  • The updated international chronic urticaria guideline emphasizes a structured, evidence-based process for diagnosis, classification, and treatment.
  • Routine workup in chronic spontaneous urticaria should be limited, with further testing guided by history, physical examination, and disease features.
  • Clinicians should actively look for rare alternative diagnoses and comorbid syndromes when the presentation is atypical or long-standing.
  • Disease activity, quality of life, and control should be monitored regularly, and patient-reported tools such as UAS7 and UCT are central to management.
  • Digital self-monitoring tools like the CRUSE app can make guideline-based tracking of urticaria easier for patients and clinicians.
  • Second-generation H1 antihistamines remain the recommended first-line therapy, with up-dosing to four times the standard dose when needed.
  • Using multiple different antihistamines or exceeding fourfold dosing is not recommended because there is insufficient evidence of benefit.
  • For antihistamine-refractory disease, omalizumab remains a key second-line treatment, while dupilumab and remibrutinib are now additional second-line options.
  • Treatment choice among second-line options may be influenced by comorbidities, prior biologic exposure, and other patient-specific factors.
  • Long-term systemic corticosteroids are discouraged, although brief rescue courses may be used for acute flares.
  • Newer therapies such as dupilumab and remibrutinib show meaningful efficacy in phase 3 trials, including in subgroups such as omalizumab-refractory or low-IgE patients.
  • The overall goal of care is to keep escalating or adjusting therapy until patients have no signs and symptoms and the disease is fully controlled.
  • Zuberbier et al., Allergy, 2026, in press.
  • Neisinger S et al. Asthma Allergy Immunol 2023
  • Neisinger S et al. Clinical Transl Allergy 2024
  • Sousa-Pinto B et al. Allergy 2025
  • Maurer et al., J Allergy Clin Immunol 2024; 2024;154:184-194
  • Saini et al., presented at Eastern Allergy Conference 2025
  • Metz et al., New Engl J Med. 2025, 392: 984-994
  • Metz et al., oral presentation, EAACI 2024, Valencia, Spain