Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.

  • Presentation

Trichoscopy in Hair Loss: Differentiating Androgenic Alopecia, Scarring Alopecias, and Trichotillomania

Description

The speaker explains how trichoscopy helps evaluate hair loss because clinical appearance can be misleading and the diagnosis may change after closer examination. For androgenic alopecia, the key trichoscopic sign is hair shaft thickness heterogeneity caused by follicular miniaturization, along with features such as multiple one-hair units, numerous vellus hairs, and sometimes a peripilar sign, which may indicate a poorer prognosis. Several cases show how trichoscopy can reveal alternative diagnoses: one patient initially thought to have androgenic alopecia was actually found to have fibrosing alopecia in a pattern distribution, and another had frontal fibrosing alopecia, suggested by lack of thickness heterogeneity and vellus hairs plus scarring features. A difficult young patient with rapid hair loss was first considered for alopecia areata, but the trichoscopic pattern was ultimately more consistent with trichotillomania, supported by findings such as broken hairs, flame hairs, hair powder, V-sign, and trichoptilosis, later confirmed by further imaging. The talk emphasizes that alopecia areata and trichotillomania can share some trichoscopic signs, but alopecia areata usually shows many features across a wider field, whereas sparse isolated signs are not enough for diagnosis. Overall, the message is that trichoscopy is highly useful, but careful and sometimes repeated examination is necessary because appearances can be deceptive.

View more

Conclusions

  • Trichoscopy can significantly change or refine the diagnosis of hair loss when the clinical appearance is misleading.
  • Hair shaft thickness heterogeneity is the key trichoscopic hallmark of androgenetic alopecia and helps distinguish it from other causes of alopecia.
  • Frontal fibrosing alopecia can mimic androgenetic alopecia clinically, but the lack of hair shaft thickness heterogeneity and vellus hairs supports a scarring diagnosis.
  • Peripilar signs may suggest prognostic significance, but their exact pathological meaning remains uncertain.
  • Alopecia areata should be diagnosed only when multiple characteristic trichoscopic features are present, not when isolated findings appear in a few spots.
  • Trichotillomania may resemble alopecia areata on trichoscopy, but features of mechanical hair damage and careful pattern recognition help separate the two.
  • When the initial trichoscopic impression is inconclusive, the correct approach is to keep examining more fields rather than making a premature diagnosis.
  • Overall, trichoscopy is valuable in difficult alopecia cases, but its interpretation requires caution because appearances can be deceptive.
  • The 5 trichoscopy features of androgenetic alopecia