Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.
- Presentation
Top 5 "Allergens of the Year" in Children and Why They Matter
Description
The presentation focuses on allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) in children, emphasizing that it often goes unrecognized, with about 20% of cases missed due to misdiagnosis as atopic dermatitis (AD). The speaker discusses the importance of patch testing in children and how children experience ACD at similar rates as adults. They share findings from studies indicating that ACD can occur even in infants as young as six months. The speaker highlights five specific allergens that have been recognized as allergies in children: lanolin, isobornyl acrylate, propylene glycol, methyl isothiazolinone, and cocamidopropobetain. Case studies illustrate how these allergens can exacerbate conditions in pediatric patients, often tied to everyday products. The presentation underscores the nuances of diagnosing ACD in children, especially those with AD, and advises that patch testing should be considered for persistent cases of eczema that don't respond to conventional treatments. The conclusion is that ACD is prevalent in children, necessitating increased awareness and appropriate testing to ensure proper management.
View moreConclusions
- Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) occurs in children at similar rates as in adults, highlighting the need for awareness and intervention.
- Children with atopic dermatitis (AD) may exhibit different contact allergens compared to non-atopic children, necessitating tailored approaches to patch testing.
- Patch testing is essential for diagnosing ACD in children and is the only reliable method available for detection.
- A high index of suspicion is required for children exhibiting atypical dermatitis patterns, especially if they develop new areas of involvement or worsening symptoms despite treatment.
- Common allergens affecting children include lanolin, isobornyl acrylate, propylene glycol, methylisothiazolinone, and cocamidopropyl betaine, with specific cases illustrating the relevance of these allergens in pediatric patients.
- Bruckner AL, Weston WL, Morelli JG. Does sensitization to contact allergens begin in infancy? Pediatrics. 2000 Jan;105(1):e3.
- Silverberg JI, Hou A, Warshaw EM, et al. Age-related differences in patch testing results among children: Analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data, 2001-2018. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Jul 24:S0190-9622(21)02178-2.
- Rees J, Friedmann PS, Matthews JN. Contact sensitivity to dinitrochlorobenzene is impaired in atopic subjects. Arch Dermatol. 1990 Sep;126(9):1173-5. PMID: 2396834.
- Kohli N, Nedorost S. Inflamed skin predisposes to sensitization to less potent allergens. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Aug;75(2):312-317.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Jun 8. PMID: 27287247.
- Malajian D, Belsito DV. Cutaneous delayed-type hypersensitivity in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Aug;69(2):232-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.03.012. Epub 2013 Apr 11. PMID: 23583066.
- Schalock PC, Dunnick CA, Nedorost S, et al. Pediatric Baseline Patch Test Series: 2020 Update. Dermatitis. 2020 Sep-Oct;31(5):279-282.
- Collis RW, Tam I, Snyder A, et al. Evaluating the inclusiveness of common allergens in expanded series patch tests for children in the pediatric allergic contact dermatitis registry. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Jul 24:S0190-9622(21)02176-9.
- Neale H, Garza-Mayers AC, Tam I, Yu J. Pediatric allergic contact dermatitis. Part 2: Patch testing series, procedure, and unique scenarios. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Feb;84(2):247-255. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Nov 17. PMID: 33217511.
- Jenkins BA, Belsito DV. Lanolin. Dermatitis. 2023 Jan-Feb;34(1):4-12. doi: 10.1089/derm.2022.0002. PMID: 36917502.
- Alves da Silva C, Bregnhøj A, Mowitz M, et al. Contact dermatitis in children caused by diabetes devices. Contact Dermatitis. 2022 Nov;87(5):406-413. doi: 10.1111/cod.14166. Epub 2022 Jun 13. PMID: 35634681.
- Herman A, Aerts O, Baeck M, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by isobornyl acrylate in Freestyle® Libre, a newly introduced glucose sensor. Contact Dermatitis. 2017.
- Ahrensbøll-Friis U, Simonsen AB, Zachariae C, Thyssen JP, Johansen JD. Contact dermatitis caused by glucose sensors, insulin pumps, and tapes: Results from a 5-year period. Contact Dermatitis. 2021 Feb;84(2):75-81.
- Vidal-Albareda C, Yelmo-Valverde R, Solórzano-Zepeda C, et al. Prevalence of contact dermatitis to glucose sensors in pediatric population and the main allergens involved. Contact Dermatitis. 2020 Jul;83(1):47-49.
- Reeder MJ, Warshaw E, Aravamuthan S, et al. Trends in the Prevalence of Methylchloroisothiazolinone/Methylisothiazolinone Contact Allergy in North America and Europe. JAMA Dermatol. 2023 Mar 1;159(3):267-274. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.5991. PMID: 36652228; PMCID: PMC9857829.
- Agar N, Freeman S. Cheilitis caused by contact allergy to cocamidopropyl betaine in '2-in-1 toothpaste and mouthwash'. Australas J Dermatol. 2005 Feb;46(1):15-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-0960.2005.00129.x. PMID: 15670171.
- DeKoven JG, Warshaw EM, Reeder MJ, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch Test Results: 2019-2020. Dermatitis. 2023 Mar-Apr;34(2):90-104. doi: 10.1089/derm.2022.29017.jdk. Epub 2023 Jan 19. PMID: 36917520.