Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.

  • Presentation

The Morbilliform Eruption: Differentiation and Treatment of Viral, Low-risk Drug, Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions, and GVHD

Description

In this session, Dr. Ben Kaffenberger, a dermatologist at Ohio State University, discusses the differentiation and treatment of morbilliform eruptions in patients, especially within a hospital environment. He emphasizes the importance of identifying low-risk versus high-risk skin reactions to guide treatment decisions effectively. Key learning objectives include recognizing the morphological patterns of eruptions and understanding the clinical implications of different drug reactions, including DRESS and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. The presentation involves input from several experts who provide insights into the evaluation of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and how skin reactions may present differently in individuals with skin of color. Dr. Kaffenberger highlights that morbilliform eruptions are the most common type of dermatologic reaction observed in hospitalized patients, with 50-70% of consultations being related to these reactions. He encourages dermatologists to accurately identify high-risk features, such as facial involvement, edema, pustules, vesicles, and duskiness, which require closer monitoring and potential lab testing. The session aims to improve overall patient outcomes by enhancing clinicians' ability to differentiate types of skin reactions promptly, thus ensuring timely and appropriate treatments.

View more

Conclusions

  • Differentiating low-risk from high-risk morbilliform eruptions is crucial for patient management.
  • Clinical examination can effectively identify high-risk features such as facial involvement and pustules.
  • The presence of duskiness, edema, and mucosal involvement further indicates a high-risk reaction.
  • Laboratory testing and potential skin biopsy should be considered for high-risk patients to confirm the diagnosis.
  • Low-risk drug reactions, while less severe, still significantly impact patient well-being and require attention.
  • The diagnosis of cutaneous adverse drug reactions is often inaccurate and can result in increased healthcare costs if mismanaged.
  • Cross-reactivity between antibiotic classes is a concern and should be assessed in patients with a history of drug allergies.
  • Patients' skin reactions to antibiotics can vary considerably based on the specific drug class and patient history.
  • Amparo Hernandez-Salazar, et al. Arch of Medical Research, Volume 37, Issue 7, October 2006, Pages 899-902
  • Patel et al. Indian J Dermatol Venereol
  • Kardaun SH, Br J Dermatol 2013;169:1071-80.
  • N Engl J Med 1973; 289:327-328
  • Gilkey, Amigo, Himed et al. . Oblique Earlobe Crease for Diagnosing DRESS syndrome. JEADV 2022.
  • Bigby et al. JAMA 1986, 256:3358-63
  • Bigby - Rates of cutaneous reactions to drugs. Arch Dermatol. 2001; 137, 765-770
  • Naranjo C, Clin Pharmacol Ther 1981;30:239-45.
  • Khan, Solendesky. Drug Allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 125:S126-37
  • Sastre et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012; 129(2):566