Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.

  • Presentation

Systematic Review of Work-Related Burden and Psychosocial Impact of Immune-Mediated Skin Diseases

Description

The speaker describes a systematic review and meta-analysis on the work-related burden of immune-mediated inflammatory skin diseases across five atlas projects, focusing on psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, hidradenitis suppurativa, vitiligo, and alopecia areata. The review searched multiple databases without language or date restrictions, screened studies with dermatology and occupational medicine experts, and analyzed work outcomes using validated measures such as WPIA, WLQ, and sick leave duration with both frequentist and Bayesian models. Nearly 200 studies were included from over 8,100 records, but most evidence came from observational studies in high-income Western countries, especially the U.S., with psoriasis heavily overrepresented. Findings showed a meaningful occupational burden across absenteeism, productivity loss, and work impairment, but also highlighted major gaps in representation and standardization. The speaker emphasized that current work-related tools do not adequately capture psychosocial effects, mental health, and stigma, which likely contribute substantially to burden. As a follow-up, the team is developing the WAVE project, a short international questionnaire aimed at measuring work impact and stigma across skin diseases and improving future research, clinical trials, and policy evaluation.

View more

Conclusions

  • Immune-mediated inflammatory skin diseases impose a meaningful and non-negligible burden on work productivity, work status, and working life.
  • The work-related impact of these diseases is shaped not only by productivity loss but also by psychosocial distress, mental health effects, and stigma.
  • Existing studies are heavily concentrated in psoriasis and other high-income Western settings, so the evidence does not yet represent the global skin-IMID population well.
  • Validated work-impairment instruments such as WPAI, WLQ, and sick-leave measures are used inconsistently and do not capture all relevant domains.
  • Current scores and questionnaires likely miss important stigma- and psychosocial-related aspects of work impact, limiting their usefulness.
  • Patients with atopic dermatitis and hidradenitis suppurativa appear to experience particularly high work impairment in the available pooled data.
  • Sick leave and presenteeism outcomes indicate that work loss occurs across multiple disease types and regions, but the evidence remains uneven and heterogeneous.
  • A standardized, short, internationally applicable questionnaire is needed to measure work impact consistently across skin diseases and over time.
  • Future research should include broader outcomes, more diverse populations, and multidisciplinary assessment to better quantify the true occupational burden.
  • The findings support developing new tools and registries, such as the WAVE questionnaire, to improve measurement of skin-disease-related work impairment.
  • Work impact of immune-mediated inflammatory skin diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JEADV in revision
  • Mapping the global work-related impact of immune-mediated inflammatory skin diseases: a systematic review. JID under review#10.1016/j.xjidi.2026.100499