Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.
- Presentation
Skin Cancer in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Underrepresented Patients, Treatment Fatigue, and Immunosuppression Modification
Description
The talk reviewed skin cancer in solid organ transplant recipients, emphasizing underrepresented patient groups, treatment fatigue, and when to modify immunosuppression. It noted that transplant recipients have a much higher overall cancer risk, with skin cancers making up about 40% of tumors, and keratinocyte carcinomas comprising most cases. Risk varies by race, age, viral status, and other factors. For skin of color, white race is the strongest predictor of post-transplant skin cancer, but non-white patients still have elevated risk compared with non-immunosuppressed peers and often develop cancers later and in more sun-protected or HPV-associated sites, which can delay diagnosis; the speaker also discussed more tailored screening timelines for Hispanic, Asian, and African American patients. Sexual and gender minority populations were briefly reviewed, including increased Kaposi sarcoma and HPV-related risks in people with HIV and men who have sex with men, while limited data in transgender recipients showed no clear increase in skin cancer. Pediatric transplant recipients were highlighted as a growing group with substantial lifetime burden and earlier onset of disease. The talk then addressed treatment fatigue, describing the cumulative emotional, logistical, and procedural burden of repeated biopsies, surgeries, and wound care, and suggesting ways to reduce this through prevention, less invasive procedures, shared decision-making, and coordination with other clinicians. Finally, it summarized consensus guidance on immunosuppression modification: early lesions are managed locally, but oral chemoprevention and changes to immunosuppression become more relevant with repeated or high-risk SCCs. Azathioprine and calcineurin inhibitors increase skin cancer risk, mTOR inhibitors reduce risk, and close collaboration with the transplant team is essential when considering regimen changes, especially in patients with recent rejection or donor-specific antibodies.
View moreConclusions
- Solid organ transplant recipients have a markedly elevated skin cancer burden, with keratinocyte carcinomas making up most cases.
- Skin cancer risk, timing, and tumor location differ substantially by race, skin color, virus status, and age, so screening should not use a one-size-fits-all approach.
- Patients with skin of color are generally diagnosed later and often develop cancers in less sun-exposed areas, underscoring the need for tailored surveillance.
- Underrepresented groups such as sexual and gender minorities and pediatric transplant recipients have important but under-studied skin cancer risks that warrant targeted screening and follow-up.
- Treatment fatigue is a major quality-of-life issue in transplant dermatology because repeated biopsies, surgeries, and wound care create a heavy physical and emotional burden.
- Reducing procedural burden through prevention, less invasive treatments, and multidisciplinary support may help alleviate treatment fatigue.
- Immunosuppression modification is usually reserved for patients with recurrent or high-risk squamous cell carcinomas rather than for early low-risk disease.
- Transplant nephrologists and dermatologists differ somewhat in how aggressively they escalate management, but both support earlier intervention as cancer burden increases.
- Certain immunosuppressive drugs, especially azathioprine and calcineurin inhibitors, increase skin cancer risk, while mTOR inhibitors appear to lower it.
- Any change in immunosuppression must be balanced against rejection risk and coordinated closely with the transplant team.
- Zwald et al. JAAD 2011;65(2):253-261.
- Jin F et al. The Lancet Oncology. 2024.
- Mittal A, Colegio O. American Journal of Transplantation. 2019.
- Chung et al. JAMA Dermatology. 2017;153(6):552-558.
- Crow et al. Transplant International. 2019.
- Schoenberg M, Nguyen T, Yang S, Jackson Cullison S. TriNetX database study (citation text not fully visible).
- Shelton E. JAAD. 2025;93:1667-1668.
- Massey et al. JAMA Dermatology. 2021.
- Whitley et al. Transplantation Direct. 2026.