Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.
- Presentation
Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions in Hospitalized Patients: Diagnosis, Mimickers, and Management
Description
The talk reviewed severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) in hospitalized patients, focusing on DRESS and SJS-TEN, their triggers, clinical features, pathology, mimickers, and treatment. DRESS is a delayed T-cell–mediated reaction often triggered by anticonvulsants, antibiotics, or allopurinol, typically presenting 2 to 6 weeks after exposure with morbilliform rash, facial edema, fever, lymphadenopathy, eosinophilia or atypical lymphocytosis, and organ involvement most commonly affecting the liver. A case illustrated how DRESS can initially resemble SJS-TEN; the patient had mucosal pain, rash, and initially negative eosinophilia after steroid treatment, but later developed eosinophilia and transaminitis, meeting RegiSCAR criteria for definite DRESS. The speaker emphasized that DRESS can present as erythema multiforme-like or targetoid disease and that biopsy can help with prognosis and excluding mimics. Management includes stopping the culprit drug, supportive care, and systemic corticosteroids for severe disease; IVIG is not supported as monotherapy and is better considered adjunctive or reserved for refractory cases. Steroid-sparing therapies such as cyclosporine and JAK inhibitors may eventually replace steroids, while others like IL-5, IL-4/13 inhibition, and IVIG are more adjunctive. The second major topic was SJS-TEN, a related SCAR with shorter latency, dusky macules, epidermal detachment, mucosal involvement, and characteristic histology of subepidermal blistering with confluent epidermal necrosis. A GBFDE case highlighted key clinical distinctions from SJS-TEN: sharply demarcated recurrent lesions in the same sites, preserved oral mucosa, and classic “dinner plate” plaques. For SJS-TEN, the speaker discussed etanercept as a promising therapy with evidence for faster re-epithelialization and possible mortality benefit, though certainty remains low; newer investigational options include JAK inhibition and other targeted therapies. The talk concluded by calling for randomized controlled trials, standardized outcomes, and precision-medicine approaches to guide future SCAR management.
View moreConclusions
- DRESS can be difficult to diagnose early because it may initially resemble SJS/TEN or other severe drug eruptions, especially when steroids blunt classic findings.
- Skin biopsy is helpful but often nonspecific, so diagnosis should rely on the overall clinical picture and scoring systems such as RegiSCAR.
- Severe DRESS should be treated with systemic corticosteroids after stopping the suspected drug and other nonessential medications.
- IVIG should not be used as monotherapy for DRESS, but it may have a limited adjunctive role in selected cases.
- Targetoid or erythema multiforme-like DRESS is a concerning phenotype because it can mimic SJS/TEN and is associated with internal organ involvement.
- For SJS/TEN, prompt recognition, withdrawal of the culprit drug, and intensive supportive care are the foundation of management.
- Distinguishing SJS/TEN from generalized bullous fixed drug eruption depends heavily on clues like lesion pattern, mucosal involvement, recurrence at the same sites, and biopsy findings.
- Etanercept has the strongest emerging evidence among biologic therapies for SJS/TEN and may shorten re-epithelialization time and possibly reduce mortality.
- Current evidence for many steroid-sparing therapies in SCARs remains low certainty, so treatment choices often depend on institutional practice and multidisciplinary input.
- Future progress in SCAR management will likely require randomized controlled trials and biomarker-guided precision medicine to better match therapies to disease biology.
- Bolognia JL et al. Dermatology, 4th ed., 2018.
- Kardaun SH et al. Br J Dermatol 2013;169:1071-80.
- Gilkey TW et al. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2022.
- Chi MH et al. Br J Dermatol 2014;170:866-73.
- Vinay K et al. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2026 Jan 28:llag045.
- Wei BM et al. J Am Acad Dermatol 2023; in press.
- Joly P et al. Arch Dermatol 2012;148:543-4.
- Sim DW et al. Clin Transl Sci 2022;15:782-8.
- Micheletti RG et al. J Invest Dermatol. 2018 Nov;138(11):2315-2321.
- Elder et al., Lever’s Histopathology of the Skin, 11th edition.#10.1111/j.1600-0560.2008.01213.x
- Bastuji-Garin S et al. J Invest Dermatol. 2000 Aug;115(2):149-53.
- Seminario-Vidal L, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Jun;82(6):1553-1567.
- Wang CW et al. J Clin Invest. 2018 Mar 1;128(3):985-996.
- Jacobsen A et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 11;3(3):CD013130.
- He CX et al. Front Immunol. 2024 Aug 7;15:1421684.
- Xiong H and Shen Z. Mol Immunol. 2026 Jan;189:174-180.
- Nordmann TM et al. Nature 2024.