Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.
- Presentation
Reconstruction of Large Nasal Defects without Interpolated Flaps
Description
The presentation focused on reconstructive techniques for large nasal defects that do not require interpolated flaps, addressing patients who may not be suitable candidates for such procedures. The speaker discussed three primary methods: crescentic advancement flaps, multi lobe flaps, and spear flaps. The crescentic advancement flap is utilized effectively for lateral nasal sidewall defects, emphasizing flap design and tension management to promote optimal healing and cosmetic outcomes. Multi lobe flaps, initially limited to smaller defects, are now recognized for their applicability to larger nasal defects as well; the speaker highlighted the importance of flap orientation and tension vector management to avoid distortion of the alar rim. Finally, the spear flap technique was described for more extensive full thickness defects, demonstrating its versatility and effectiveness. Success in these methods relies on careful design, planning, and understanding the anatomical structures involved to achieve satisfactory cosmetic results.
View moreConclusions
- Crescentic advancement flaps can effectively reconstruct large nasal defects without interpolated flaps.
- Multi-lobe flaps can be utilized for larger nasal defects beyond the previously established size limit of 1.5 cm.
- The trilobed flap provides a successful option for repairing distal nasal defects that may not respond well to bilobed flaps.
- Proper alignment of nasolabial folds is crucial for achieving aesthetic symmetry after nasal reconstruction.
- Utilizing tension vectors appropriately can prevent distortion and complications during the healing of nasal flaps.
- Targeted second intention healing can be advantageous for optimizing cosmetic outcomes in flap repairs.
- Postoperative assessments indicate satisfactory cosmetic outcomes with minimal complications for various flap techniques used in nasal reconstruction.
- J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1991;17:447-454.
- Plast Reconstr. Surg. 121: 277, 2008.
- Dermatol Surg 2005;31:1409-1416.
- Arch Dermatol. 1989 Jul;125(7):957-9.
- J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Aug;75(8):2757-2774.
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 142(2):p 511-519, Aug 2018.
- Dermatologic Surgery, 36 (11), 1726-1735.
- Dermatol Surg 2003;29:956-962.
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 79 (6), 915