Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.
- Presentation
Practical Uses and Principles of V-Y Advancement Flaps in Reconstructive Surgery
Description
The speaker presents V-Y advancement flaps as a highly versatile, practical reconstructive option and emphasizes a decision-making framework based on function, protection of free margins, available donor tissue, aesthetic alignment with tension lines and cosmetic subunits, and patient preference. He describes V-Y flaps as single-stage, robustly vascularized, tissue-conserving, and efficient, with limited undermining and broad tension distribution. For planning, he favors a generous design, often about 2.5 times the defect size, with careful undermining around the defect, preservation of a vascular pedicle, and closure using key stitches and alternating deep sutures to ensure even tension and good contour. He illustrates many applications, including eyebrow/glabellar, eyelid, cheek, nasal tip and ala, lip, earlobe, combined cutaneous-mucosal defects, hands, fingers, upper back, and lower leg. He also notes variations such as tunneled, transposition, rotation-like, and combined muscle sling approaches, and stresses adapting the plane of dissection to the anatomic site to avoid distortion, trapdoor deformity, dog ears, or lid pull.
View moreConclusions
- The V-to-Y advancement flap is presented as a highly versatile, reliable single-stage reconstruction option with a robust blood supply and efficient tissue use.
- Successful flap planning depends first on function, free margins, and available tissue reservoir, then on hiding incisions in natural lines and matching cosmetic units.
- A generous design and wide undermining generally improve reach, reduce tension, and help avoid deformity or trapdoor effects.
- The technique can be adapted to many facial and nonfacial sites, especially the upper lip, eyebrow/glabella, eyelids, cheek, nose, earlobe, fingers, back, arms, and legs.
- For many defects, the flap can be extended, tunneled, flipped, combined with a muscle sling, or paired with mucosal advancement to fit the specific anatomic need.
- The speaker’s overall conclusion is that when in doubt, a V-to-Y flap is often a practical default that produces good cosmetic and functional results.
- Large or difficult defects can often still be closed effectively by using multiple V-to-Y flaps or keystone-style variants rather than more complex reconstructions.
- The flap is especially useful when preserving nearby normal tissue and maintaining contour are more important than simply covering the wound.
- Proper depth of dissection must be adjusted to the location, with muscle incorporation used when needed and less deep dissection used where subcutaneous tissue is ample.
- Patient-specific anatomy and the direction of tissue laxity ultimately determine whether a V-to-Y advancement flap is the best reconstructive choice.
- Reconstructive Dermatologic Surgery, Jiang SB and Ortiz AE, eds. Jaypee Brothers, 2018.
- 2018 Jaypee - Reconstructive Dermatologic Surgery. S. Brian Jiang & Arisa Ortiz.
- Cvancara JL, Wentzell JM. Shark Island Pedicle Flap for Repair of Combined Nasal Ala-Perialar Defects. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32:726-729.#10.1111/j.1524-4725.2006.32146.x
- J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012 Aug;65(8):1087-95.