Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.
- Presentation
Practical Use, Monitoring, and Safety of JAK Inhibitors
Description
The speaker presents a practical approach to using JAK inhibitors, emphasizing that they can be highly effective, fast-acting treatments that may reduce steroid use and sometimes treat multiple inflammatory diseases at once. They argue that black box warnings should be viewed as risk signals rather than absolute contraindications and that patients with risk factors can often be medically optimized rather than excluded. The talk focuses on real-world laboratory monitoring: baseline labs similar to biologics plus a lipid panel, with consideration of CPK, pregnancy testing, and infection screening such as TB and hepatitis B/C. Ongoing monitoring typically includes CBC with differential, CMP, and lipids every few months, with attention to neutrophils, lymphocytes, hemoglobin, platelets, liver enzymes, creatinine, and triglycerides. Safety concerns reviewed include infections, thrombosis, cardiovascular events, malignancy, pregnancy, and JAK-associated acne, with the highest caution urged in older or higher-risk patients. Vaccination guidance highlights shingles, flu, pneumonia, and COVID vaccines, and the speaker advises not delaying JAK treatment until completion of the full shingles series. Practical prescribing tips include starting at the lowest effective dose, reviewing the patient’s history of clots, cardiac disease, cancer, cholesterol, and blood pressure, and discussing that the benefits may outweigh the risks in selected patients who are suffering significantly.
View moreConclusions
- JAK inhibitors appear to offer rapid, highly effective control of inflammatory skin and autoimmune diseases, often achieving near-clearance and major itch relief.
- Their risks are real but are often manageable through patient selection, dose choice, baseline screening, vaccination, and laboratory monitoring rather than automatic avoidance.
- The strongest practical monitoring approach is to use biologic-style baseline labs plus a lipid panel, then repeat CBC, CMP, and lipids on a risk-adjusted schedule.
- CBC monitoring should focus on ANC, ALC, hemoglobin, and platelets, with dose reduction or stopping reserved for meaningful or progressive cytopenias.
- Lipid elevations are common but usually manageable, and statins or other lipid-lowering therapy can allow continued treatment in many patients.
- Quantiferon/TB testing and hepatitis B/C screening remain important before starting therapy because reactivation can occur.
- Routine CPK monitoring is usually unnecessary unless symptoms suggest myopathy or rhabdomyolysis.
- Vaccination is a key risk-mitigation strategy, especially for recombinant zoster vaccine, flu, COVID, and pneumococcal vaccination.
- Black-box warnings for VTE, MACE, and malignancy should be interpreted as risk signals that require screening and counseling, not as absolute contraindications for every patient.
- The excess clotting and cardiovascular signals were largely driven by higher-risk rheumatoid arthritis populations and seem less pronounced in healthier dermatology patients.
- Patients with prior thrombosis, cardiovascular disease, cancer, or other risk factors can often still be treated if those risks are medically optimized and the patient is counseled appropriately.
- Pregnancy data are limited, so JAK inhibitors are generally avoided in pregnancy and contraception counseling is recommended.
- JAK-inhibitor acne is a dose-dependent and usually manageable adverse effect rather than a reason to abandon therapy in most cases.
- Overall, the presentation argues for a practical, individualized approach: ask about the major 'three C's' of clots, cardiac disease, and cancer, monitor labs, vaccinate, and treat when the expected benefit is high.
- Silverberg JI, et al. Upadacitinib versus dupilumab in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2025.
- Winterfield L, Vleugels RA, Park KK. The Value of the Black Box Warning in Dermatology. J Drugs Dermatol. 2015 Jul;14(7):660-6.
- Tofacitinib as treatment for refractory dermatomyositis: A retrospective study from 2 academic medical centers. PMID 34246697. DOI 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.07.003.#10.1016/j.jaad.2021.07.003
- Morand, Petri, and Alsukait trial citations for JAK/STAT/TYK2 in lupus.
- Tofacitinib Treatment and Molecular Analysis of Cutaneous Sarcoidosis. N Engl J Med.#10.1056/nejmoa1805958
- Adas MA, Alveyn E, Cook E, et al. The infection risks of JAK inhibition. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2022;18:253-261.#10.1080/1744666x.2022.2014323
- Haag, Carter, et al. Laboratory and vaccine monitoring recommendations for Janus kinase inhibitor treatment of atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol.
- Ytterberg SR, Bhatt DL, Mikuls TR, et al. Cardiovascular and cancer risk with tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2022.#10.1056/nejmoa2109927
- Rajput Khokhar A, Ghoreschi K, Huynh J. Adverse effects of Janus kinase inhibitors with relevance for daily practice in dermatology. JDDG. 2025;23(9):1127-1140.#10.1111/ddg.15796
- Reich K, Teixeira HD, de Bruin-Weller M, et al. Lancet 2021 trial citation for upadacitinib/JAKacne data.