Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.

  • Presentation

Overview and Management of EGFR Inhibitor–Induced Skin Toxicities

Description

The speaker reviews epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRI)–induced skin toxicities and emphasizes the important role dermatologists play in keeping cancer patients on therapy by distinguishing clinically significant rashes from those that do not require treatment interruption. EGFRIs include monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and their cutaneous side effects are extremely common. The most frequent toxicities are acneiform eruptions, xerosis, eczematous dermatitis, fissuring, pruritus, mucositis, nail changes such as paronychia and pyogenic granuloma-like lesions, hair changes, and occasional severe scalp dermatoses. Acneiform rash typically appears within 1–2 weeks, peaks at 3–5 weeks, and may later be complicated by bacterial superinfection, especially Staphylococcus aureus. Risk and severity can be worsened by sun exposure, chemotherapy, radiation, and nutritional deficiency. Strong evidence supports preemptive care, including moisturizers, low-potency topical steroids, sunscreen, sun protection, and a tetracycline antibiotic, which reduce rash severity, need for rescue treatments, and dose interruptions. Management is then tailored by severity: topical steroids and antibiotics for mild disease, tetracyclines and stronger topical therapy for moderate disease, and occasional systemic steroids or low-dose retinoids for severe refractory cases. Paronychia and pyogenic granuloma-like lesions are treated with anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial measures, careful nail care, antiseptic soaks, topical beta blockers, silver nitrate, and sometimes partial matricectomy. Xerosis and eczema may respond well to dupilumab. The speaker also highlights the emerging importance of checking for nutritional deficiencies, especially zinc, but also vitamins B6, C, and selenium, because replacement may improve difficult cases and help patients continue EGFRI therapy.

View more

Conclusions

  • EGFR inhibitor skin toxicities are extremely common, affecting most treated patients and sometimes nearly all of them.
  • The most common and clinically important eruption is an early papulopustular/acneiform rash that usually begins within 1 to 2 weeks and peaks by 3 to 5 weeks.
  • Later toxicities such as xerosis, eczematous dermatitis, paronychia, and hair/nail changes can emerge or worsen over time, so long-term monitoring is necessary.
  • Preventive regimens started at treatment onset, especially tetracycline antibiotics plus topical steroids, moisturizers, and sun protection, reduce rash severity, rescue treatments, and cancer therapy interruptions.
  • Dermatologic management can help patients stay on effective cancer therapy by decreasing unnecessary dose holds and changes.
  • More severe or late papulopustular eruptions may reflect bacterial superinfection, especially with Staphylococcus aureus, and culture-guided antibiotic treatment can be important.
  • Oral retinoids can help refractory acneiform eruptions and erosive pustular scalp disease, but they should be used cautiously because they can worsen dryness.
  • Topical beta blockers appear useful for paronychia and pyogenic granuloma-like lesions and may be a practical low-risk adjunct.
  • Dupilumab has promising evidence for EGFRi- or TKI-associated eczematous dermatitis and may reduce the need for systemic steroids.
  • Nutritional deficiencies, especially zinc deficiency, appear to contribute to some EGFRi skin toxicities and may respond to supplementation.
  • Zinc repletion at modest doses can improve cutaneous toxicity, but excessive zinc should be avoided because of the risk of copper deficiency.
  • Overall, EGFRi toxicities are predictable and manageable, and proactive dermatologic care can improve both skin outcomes and continuation of cancer therapy.
  • J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Jun;34(6):1340-1347.
  • JAMA Dermatol. 2020 Oct 1;156(10):1079-1085.
  • N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 10;364(10):947-55.
  • Oncologist 2006; 11:1010-7.
  • Dermatology. 2021;237(6):929-933.
  • Br J Dermatol. 2016 Dec;175(6):1166-1174.
  • Lancet Oncol. 2005 Jul;6(7):491-500.
  • J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr 3143).
  • JAMA Oncol. 2026 Jan 22:e256092.
  • J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023 Feb;37(2):328-339.
  • JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Sep 1;153(9):906-910.