Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.

Presentation

Nasal Alar Reconstruction: Simple and Complex Approaches to Common Defects

Description

This transcript covers the nuances of nasal alar reconstruction, focusing on both simple and complex repair techniques for defects involving the ala and alar crease. The speaker defines 'simple repairs' as techniques that require minimal tissue manipulation, including second intention healing, and describes specific cases where these methods were successfully applied, leading to good outcomes. Complex repairs involve techniques such as spiral flaps, bilobe, trilobe flaps, and interpolated cheek flaps, showcasing a variety of cases where these were implemented effectively. The speaker emphasizes the importance of patient preferences and surgeon comfort in choosing repair techniques, suggesting that for deep yet small wounds, simpler methods may suffice, while larger defects often necessitate more intricate procedures. Throughout, complications and their management are discussed, underscoring the dynamic considerations in achieving aesthetic and functional outcomes in nasal reconstruction.

View more

Conclusions

Nasal alar reconstruction can be approached using either simple methods, such as second intention healing or skin grafts, or more complex methods like flaps depending on the defect characteristics.
Second intention healing is suitable for small, thin defects on the alar, particularly if there is minimal risk of alar rim displacement.
Cartilage grafts can be added to second intention healing to enhance stability in slightly deeper defects.
Skin grafts are recommended for all thin defects regardless of size, as they carry low morbidity and can be reversed if necessary.
Drumhead grafts present a technique to address deeper defects while maintaining external contour by utilizing specialized bolsters.
Flaps, including spiral, bilobed, and trilobed flaps, are effective for larger or more complex defects, particularly when more tissue manipulation is warranted.
Complex repairs should consider patient preferences and aesthetic goals, with flaps generally preferred for aesthetically demanding patients who want a quicker resolution.
The choice of which method to use should consider defect characteristics such as size, depth, and location relative to the alar rim.
Successful outcomes in nasal reconstruction depend on meticulous surgical technique and appropriate selection of repair methods.

Draper BK and Wentzell JM. The "drumhead" graft of deep nasal alar defects. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33:17-22.
Barlow JO. The placement of structural cartilage grafts under full-thickness skin grafts: a case series and strategies for successful outcomes. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36:1166-70.
Mahlberg MJ, Leach BC, Cook JW. The spiral flap for nasal reconstruction: our experience with 63 patients. Dermatol Surg 2012;38:373-380.
Zitelli JA. The bilobed flap for nasal reconstruction. Arch Dermatol 1989;125:957-9.
Krathen RA, Donnelly HB. The tertiary arc for the bilobed flap. Dermatol Surg.
Albertini JG, Hansen JP. Trilobed flap reconstruction for distal nasal skin defects. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36:1726-35.
Fisher GH, Cook JW. The interpolated paranasal flap: a novel and advantageous option for nasal-alar reconstruction. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35:656-61.
Baker SR, Naficy S. Principles of Nasal Reconstruction. Mosby. 2002
Cook JL. Reconstruction of a full-thickness alar wound with a single operative procedure. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29:956-62.
Asgari M, Odland P. Nasalis Island Pedicle Flap in Nasal Alar Reconstruction. Dermatol Surg 2005;31:448-52.