Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.
- Presentation
Mohs Surgery for Melanoma: Current Evidence and Guidelines
Description
In this presentation, Wesley Yu from Oregon Health and Science University discusses Mohs surgery for melanoma, covering current evidence and guidelines. The talk begins by comparing Mohs surgery with traditional excision techniques, highlighting a notable difference in local recurrence rates found in a 2021 meta-analysis, showing Mohs surgery achieved a significantly lower rate. However, Yu stresses the complexity of interpreting these outcomes due to potential selection bias in retrospective studies. He raises questions about the quality of life and cosmetic outcomes associated with Mohs surgery, acknowledging both its potential to offer good results but also cautioning against excessive tissue removal. Regarding survival rates, Yu notes mixed findings from recent studies, with no definitive advantage of Mohs surgery over wide excision. He emphasizes that current guidelines generally prefer wide excision with permanent sectioning for melanoma unless specific circumstances warrant Mohs surgery. Yu concludes by stating that while Mohs surgery can be valuable in certain cases, more high-quality, prospective research is needed to clarify its role and effectiveness. The presentation underscores the importance of adhering to established guidelines and engaging in further studies to improve treatment standards.
View moreConclusions
- Mohs surgery for melanoma may significantly reduce local recurrence rates compared to traditional excision methods.
- While Mohs surgery can offer improved cosmetic outcomes, it is questioned whether the benefits of increased defect size outweigh potential harms caused by unnecessary excisions.
- The impact of Mohs surgery on patient survival is still a matter of debate with mixed data and a lack of high-level evidence.
- Current guidelines suggest Mohs surgery may be beneficial in anatomically constrained areas or for certain melanoma subtypes, but it is not the standard treatment for all cases.
- There's a necessity for more rigorous studies, including randomized controlled trials, to definitively establish the efficacy of Mohs surgery in various contexts.
- Despite promising retrospective data, careful consideration is needed regarding when to employ Mohs surgery for melanoma.
- Bittar, P. G., Bittar, J. M., Etzkorn, J. R., Aasi, S., Bordeaux, J. S., Miller, C. J., et al. 'Systematic review and meta-analysis of local recurrence rates of head and neck cutaneous melanomas after wide local excision, Mohs micrographic surgery, or staged excision.' Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
- Torbeck, R. L., Ratner, D. 'Limitations in the literature regarding Mohs surgery and staged excision for melanoma: A critical review of quality and data reporting.'
- Cheraghlou, S., Christensen, S. R., Agogo, G. O., Girardi, M. 'Comparison of Survival After Mohs Micrographic Surgery vs Wide Margin Excision for Early-Stage Invasive Melanoma.' DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, Volume 82, Issue 1, P149-155, January 2020.
- Knackstedt, T. J. 'Differences in sentinel lymph node biopsy utilization in eligible melanoma patients treated with Mohs micrographic surgery or wide local excision: A population-based logistic regression model and survival analysis.'