Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.

  • Presentation

Mohs Micrographic Surgery for Melanoma: The Controversy and the Evidence

Description

The speaker advocates for the use of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) as a primary treatment for melanoma, particularly for cases on the head and neck where standard wide local excision (WLE) is currently the recommended approach. The discussion references clinical guidelines from the AAD and NCCN, suggesting that while WLE is standard, MMS should be considered, especially in anatomically constrained areas where melanoma can have complex margins. The traditional clinical trials that established current practices mainly focused on lower-risk sites and did not adequately address the nuances of melanoma in high-risk areas like the head and neck. Statistical data presented show that MMS has lower local recurrence and higher overall survival rates compared to both staged excisions and standard WLE. Despite its advantages, the speaker highlights challenges in implementing MMS, including difficulties in pathologic interpretation, high costs, and limited reimbursement. Additionally, the necessity for greater clinician training is emphasized to improve referral rates for MMS. Overall, the speaker calls for more research to validate the benefits of MMS for melanoma and to potentially adjust existing treatment guidelines.

View more

Conclusions

  • Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) may be a superior therapeutic option for both invasive and in situ melanoma, particularly on the head and neck, given its lower recurrence rates compared to wide local excision (WLE).
  • Current clinical guidelines underestimate the required margins for head and neck melanomas, leading to inadequate treatment and higher local recurrence rates.
  • MMS offers more complete margin analysis, evaluating 100% of the peripheral and deep margins, which significantly reduces the risk of positive margins.
  • Patients treated with MMS have improved overall survival rates compared to those treated with WLE.
  • Despite the evidence supporting MMS, training, cost, and access to specialized surgeons remain challenges hindering its widespread adoption for melanoma treatment.
  • Kimyai-Asadi A, Katz T, Goldberg LH, Ayala GB, Wang SQ, Vujevich JJ, Jih MH. Margin involvement after the excision of melanoma in situ: the need for complete en face examination of the surgical margins. Dermatol Surg. 2007 Dec;33(12):1434-9; discussion 1439-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.33313.x. PMID: 18076608.
  • Etzkorn JR, Sobanko JF, Elenitsas R, Newman JG, Goldbach H, Shin TM, Miller CJ. Low recurrence rates for in situ and invasive melanomas using Mohs micrographic surgery with melanoma antigen recognized by T cells 1 (MART-1) immunostaining: tissue processing methodology to optimize pathologic staging and margin assessment. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 May;72(5):840-50.
  • Brodland DG. Mohs Micrographic Surgery for Melanoma: Evidence, Controversy, and a Critical Review of Excisional Margin Guidelines. Dermatol Clin. 2023 Jan;41(1):79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2022.07.008. Epub 2022 Oct 28. PMID: 36410985.
  • Rzepecki AK, Hwang CD, Etzkorn JR, Shin TM, Sobanko JF, Howe NM, Miller CJ. The rule of 10s versus the rule of 2s: High complication rates after conventional excision with postoperative margin assessment of specialty site versus trunk and proximal extremity melanomas. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Aug;85(2):442-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.11.008. Epub 2018 Nov 14. PMID: 30447316.
  • Leitenberger J, Bar A. An Update and Review of Clinical Outcomes Using Immunohistochemical Stains in Mohs Micrographic Surgery for Melanoma. Dermatologic Surgery. 2024;50(1):9-15. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003945.
  • Beaulieu D, Fathi R, Srivastava D, Nijhawan RI. Current perspectives on Mohs micrographic surgery for melanoma. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2018 Jun 20;11:309-320. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S137513. PMID: 29950878; PMCID: PMC6016488.