Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.
- Presentation
Metal Implants and Patch Testing: Understanding Allergies and Reactions in Orthopedic Devices
Description
The discussion addresses metal hypersensitivity associated with orthopedic implants, focusing on allergies, reactions, and patch testing. The speaker highlights the increasing use and projected market growth of metallic orthopedic devices like knee and hip implants, while acknowledging that, although most patients do well post-surgery, a subset experiences allergic reactions or device failure. The presentation details the types of reactions, including foreign body reactions and hypersensitivity mechanisms linked to metals like nickel, cobalt, and chromium, along with challenges in testing these sensitivities. It points out that up to 25% of individuals can have metal sensitivity without complications, but nearly 60% of patients with joint failures exhibit sensitivities. The types of skin reactions observed include eczematous responses and less commonly urticaria. The discussion emphasizes clinical considerations before joint replacement, particularly in patients with known metal allergies, recommending patch testing, especially prior to revision surgeries. The speaker underscores the need for thorough patient evaluations, including potential irritants from surgical processes like the use of antibiotics in irrigation. The importance of collaboration between dermatologists and surgeons is reiterated as vital for effective management and improved patient outcomes.
View moreConclusions
- Metal hypersensitivity can occur in patients with orthopedic devices, with sensitivity rates of up to 25% in well-functioning joints and as high as 60% in failed joints.
- Patients may experience localized and systemic allergic reactions to metal components, with cutaneous symptoms typically appearing weeks to years after implantation.
- Current data suggests a complex relationship between metal sensitivity and joint implant failure, necessitating careful evaluation and management.
- Patch testing is recommended primarily for patients with a history of metal allergy, especially when considering revision surgeries for failed implants.
- Successful management of metal hypersensitivity often involves a multidisciplinary approach, including collaboration between dermatologists and orthopedic surgeons.
- Antibiotic irrigation and surgical dressings can also contribute to allergic reactions, highlighting the need for thorough preoperative assessments.
- Kurtz S et al, J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007
- Chan P et al, JAMA, 2011
- American College of rheumatology (2023)
- Ratner BD. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2019
- Ratner, B.D. et al; Biomaterials science, third edition: An introduction to materials in medicine. 3rd ed. 2013.
- Urban, R.M. et al; The journal of bone and joint surgery; 2000
- Hall, et al; J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2018
- Akil S, et al. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018
- Niki Y et al; Biomaterials. 2005
- Granchi et al; J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012
- Schuttelaar M.L.A et al; Contact dermatitis; 2018
- Storrs F.J. et al; Cutis, 2000
- Lagrelius M et al; Contact Dermatitis. 2016
- Wawrzynski J, et al. Rheumatol Ther. 2017
- Thomas, P. et al; Contact Dermatitis, 2006
- Kelly RE, et al. Ann Surg 2010
- Gill HS et al, Trends Mol Med; 2012
- Schmidt, M. Nature Immunol. 2012
- Brozovich, A. et al; Ther Adv Musculoskel Dis; 2022
- Lynn DD, et al. J Clin Cosmet Dermatol. 2017
- Diomidis N et al. / Acta Biomaterialia 2012
- Halwani DO, et al: J INVASIVE CARDIOL 2010
- Shachar K et al; Skeletal Radiology 2016
- Saleh K et al; J Orthop Res. 2016
- Gensch et al; Hautarzt. 1981
- Aneja et al; Contact Dermatitis, 2011
- N. Diomidis et al. / Acta Biomaterialia 2012