Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.
- Presentation
Melanoma Outcomes, Immunotherapy Advances, and Gene Expression Profiling Guidelines
Description
The talk reviewed melanoma epidemiology, survival trends, and how outcomes have improved dramatically over the past 10 to 15 years, especially for advanced disease, largely because of immunotherapy. The speaker highlighted major gains with anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 treatments in unresectable metastatic melanoma, as well as better outcomes in node-positive and resectable advanced disease with adjuvant and neoadjuvant pembrolizumab. The lecture then focused on gene expression profiling in early-stage melanoma, explaining that guidelines have shifted from skepticism toward selective use in carefully chosen patients, particularly T1B and T2A cases where the result may help shared decision-making about sentinel lymph node biopsy. The speaker described prospective data from the Merlin-01 study showing the test can identify some patients with less than 10% sentinel node risk, but not reliably less than 5%, and emphasized that its value is limited in thicker tumors and remains uncertain for guiding surveillance or additional treatment. The talk also compared newer tests such as i31, noted the importance of prospective blinded validation and clinical utility, and cautioned that more intensive imaging surveillance has not been shown to improve survival and may be associated with worse outcomes and higher costs.
View moreConclusions
- Melanoma incidence remains high, but survival is excellent for localized disease and has improved substantially for advanced disease over the last decade.
- Checkpoint immunotherapy, especially anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 combinations, has driven major gains in metastatic melanoma survival.
- Neoadjuvant immunotherapy before surgery appears to improve outcomes for resectable advanced melanoma compared with surgery followed by adjuvant therapy alone.
- Gene expression profiling should not replace standard pathologic staging, but it may help select a small subset of lower-risk T1b/T2a patients for sentinel node biopsy decisions.
- Prospective, blinded, multicenter validation is essential before gene expression profiling tests should be widely adopted for clinical decision-making.
- The MERLIN_001 CP-GEP test identified patients with less than 10% sentinel node positivity risk, but it did not reliably identify a group below 5% risk overall.
- A high-risk CP-GEP result was associated with substantially higher sentinel node positivity than a low-risk result, supporting some predictive value.
- CP-GEP appears to add value beyond clinicopathologic nomograms in some threshold ranges, but its advantage is modest and context dependent.
- Current clinical “high-risk” features alone do not reliably identify T1a patients with sufficiently high nodal risk to justify routine sentinel node biopsy.
- The 31-gene i31-GEP test may identify low- and high-risk groups, but much of its apparent prognostic value may overlap with already favorable or unfavorable tumor features.
- There is still not enough prospective evidence that high-risk GEP results should guide more intensive surveillance or additional treatment.
- More frequent CT or PET-CT surveillance has not improved outcomes and may be associated with worse survival and higher costs.
- Overall, these tests may be useful for carefully selected patients, but their routine use for surveillance or treatment escalation remains unproven.
- Siegel et al, CA Cancer J Clin 2026:76:e70043
- Siegel et al, CA Cancer J Clin 2026;76:e70043
- Siegel et al, CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61:212
- Wolchok et al., New England Journal of Medicine 2025
- Korn et al., Journal of Clinical Oncology 2008
- Wolchok et al, N Engl J Med 2025;392:11
- Kirkwood et al, Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:1670
- Sosman et al, Cancer 2011;117:4740
- Sondak and Clune, Ann Surg Onc 2026; epub
- Grossman et al, JAMA Dermatol 2020;156:1004
- Bartlett et al, Ann Surg Onc 2025;32:1429
- Hieken et al, JAMA Surg 2025;160:1358
- Bellomo et al., JCO Precision Oncol 2020;4:319
- Egger et al, European Society of Surgical Oncology 2025
- Whitman et al, JCO Precis Oncol 2021;5:1466
- Somach et al, J Am Acad Dermatol 2025;93:1129
- Beard et al, Future Oncology 2026; epub
- Beard et al., Future Oncol 2026; epub
- Dieng et al, Ann Surg Oncol 2022;29:2871