Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.

  • Presentation

GEP - PROS: Gene Expression Profiling in Melanoma

Description

David, a dermatologist from Las Vegas, presents the advantages of gene expression profiling (GEP) in melanoma diagnosis and treatment. He emphasizes the concerning mortality rates linked to malignant melanoma, highlighting that thousands of potentially preventable deaths occur annually. David asserts that the 31-gene expression profile (GEP) test can effectively risk-stratify patients for melanoma-specific survival, identifying high-risk individuals often missed by traditional staging methods. He discusses various bold claims backed by peer-reviewed studies, including that GEP-tested patients show improved survival rates compared to untested counterparts, and that GEP can pinpoint patients who can safely avoid unnecessary sentinel lymph node biopsies. He notes that, despite traditional protocols, a large number of thin melanoma patients might have occult metastases, leading to missed diagnoses and subsequent deaths. David underscores the cost-effectiveness of the 31-GEP test in reducing unnecessary procedures while maintaining diagnostic efficacy. Furthermore, he introduces the utility of a 40-gene expression profile test for identifying high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma patients who may benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy. Overall, he advocates for the integration of gene expression profiling into clinical practice to improve patient outcomes in melanoma and related skin cancers.

View more

Conclusions

  • The 31 GEP test can risk stratify patients for melanoma specific survival in a real-world setting.
  • Patients tested with the 31 GEP have better melanoma specific survival than matched untested patients.
  • The 31 GEP can identify at-risk patients that may be missed by standard staging methods.
  • The 31 GEP may allow low-risk T1B patients to safely forgo sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB).
  • The 40 GEP test can risk stratify patients with high risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and indicate potential benefit from adjunctive radiation therapy.
  • Ackerman AB. No one should die of malignant melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985 Jan;12(1 Pt 1):115-6. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(85)80242-5. PMID: 3980788.
  • Keung EZ, Gershenwald JE. The eighth edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) melanoma staging system: implications for melanoma treatment and care. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018 Aug;18(8):775-784. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1489246. PMID: 29923435; PMCID: PMC7652033.
  • Helvind NM, Brinch-Møller Weitemeyer M, Chakera AH, et al. Stage-Specific Risk of Recurrence and Death From Melanoma in Denmark, 2008-2021: A National Observational Cohort Study of 25 720 Patients With Stage IA to IV Melanoma. JAMA Dermatol. 2023;159(11):1213-1222. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.3256.
  • Gerami P, Cook RW, Russell MC, Wilkinson J, Amaria RN, Gonzalez R, Lyle S, Jackson GL, Greisinger AJ, Johnson CE, Oelschlager KM, Stone JF, Maetzold DJ, Ferris LK, Wayne JD, Cooper C, Obregon R, Delman KA, Lawson DH, Stone JF. Development of a prognostic genetic signature to predict the metastatic risk associated with cutaneous melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Jan 1;21(1):175-83. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3316. PMID: 25564571.
  • Gastman BR, Gerami P, Kurley SJ, Cook RW, Leachman S, Vetto JT. Identification of patients at risk of metastasis using a prognostic 31-gene expression profile in subpopulations of melanoma patients with favorable outcomes by standard criteria. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Jan;80(1):149-157.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.07.028. Epub 2018 Aug 4. PMID: 30081113.
  • Podlipnik S et al. The 31-Gene Expression Profile Test Outperforms AJCC in Stratifying Risk of Recurrence in Patients with Stage I Cutaneous Melanoma. Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 9;16(2):287. doi: 10.3390/cancers16020287. PMID: 38254778; PMCID: PMC10814308.
  • Wysong A et al. Integrating the 40-Gene Expression Profile (40-GEP) Test Improves Metastatic Risk-Stratification Within Clinically Relevant Subgroups of High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma (cSCC) Patients. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Mar;14(3):593-612. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01111-5. Epub 2024 Mar 1. PMID: 38424384; PMCID: PMC10965857.
  • Ruiz ES et al. Predicting adjuvant radiation therapy benefit in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with the 40-gene expression profile. Future Oncol. 2024;20(35):2737-2746. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2390820. Epub 2024 Sep 4. PMID: 39229801; PMCID: PMC11572135.