Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.

  • Presentation

Evidence-Based Management of Melanocytic Neoplasms

Description

In a recent session on evidence-based management of melanocytic neoplasms, dermatologist and dermatopathologist Dr. Jason Lee discussed the evolving standards surrounding the treatment of melanoma, particularly in the context of margins for excision. He noted the inconsistency in clinical practices and the influence of various studies on surgical margin decisions, especially emphasizing the historical perspective on the purported need for 5 cm margins stemming from outdated case studies. Current guidelines suggest a range of margins, with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommending anywhere from 0.5 cm to 2 cm based on tumor thickness and location. Dr. Lee highlighted the debate on the overdiagnosis of melanoma in-situ lesions and suggested that not all require aggressive treatment, urging a more individualized approach to their management. He also presented findings about molecular diagnostics and the diagnostic concordance issues among pathologists. Furthermore, he brought attention to the latest adjuvant therapies, such as PD-1 inhibitors, approved for use in preventing recurrence in stage 2B and 2C melanoma, and discussed the need for shared decision-making regarding their use, considering the benefits versus potential side effects. The session concluded with a call for more robust studies to clarify aspects of clinical management for these lesions.

View more

Conclusions

  • The recommended surgical margins for melanoma in situ vary and are contingent on lesion characteristics and location.
  • A one-centimeter margin is often referenced, but evidence suggests this may not be necessary for all cases.
  • Quality of evidence regarding surgical margins for melanoma in situ is considered low, largely based on case series and consensus rather than randomized trials.
  • There is significant publication bias in favor of reporting positive outcomes for larger margins.
  • Overdiagnosis of melanoma in situ is becoming more common, leading to unnecessary treatments for lesions that may not progress.
  • Melanoma in situ does not significantly impact life expectancy or mortality rates, suggesting more conservative management might be appropriate.
  • Improving diagnostic concordance among pathologists is crucial, given the significant variability in interpretations of melanocytic lesions.
  • Individualization of margin recommendations based on lesion size and anatomical site is advocated, rather than strict generalized guidelines.
  • J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;52(6):967-971.
  • Clin Exp Dermatol. 2021;46(4):715-719.
  • Edinb Med J 1908;23.6: 496
  • Lancet 1937;229.5922:508-9.
  • Tod, MargaretC. "Tragedy of malignant melanoma." The Lancet 244.6321 (1944): 532-534.
  • Handley WS. The pathology of melanotic growths in relation to their operative treatment (Lecture II). Lancet 1907;1:996-1003.
  • Curti BD, Faries MB. N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 10;384(23):2229-2240.
  • Kunishige JH, Doan L, Brodland DG, Zitelli JA. Comparison of surgical margins for lentigo maligna versus melanoma in situ. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;81(1):204-212. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.01.051
  • Grant-Kels, Jane Margaret. "JAAD Game Changers *: Comparison of surgical margins for lentigo maligna versus melanoma in situ." Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 86.1 (2022): 265.
  • Horst BA, Niedt GW, Silvers DN. Surgical margins for melanoma in situ. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67(5):1068. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2012.05.023.
  • Grossman D, Duffy KL, Bowen GM. Surgical margins for melanoma in situ. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67(5):1068-1071. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2012.04.046
  • Navarrete-Dechent C, Aleissa S, Ariyan C, Busam KJ, Nehal KS. Comment on "Comparison of surgical margins for lentigo maligna versus melanoma in situ". J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;81(4):e115-e116. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.05.104
  • Elder DE, Barnhill RL, Eguchi M, Elmore JG, Kerr KF, Knezevich S. Melanoma in situ and low-risk pT1a melanoma: Need for new diagnostic terminology. Clin Dermatol. Published online September 13, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2024.09.006
  • Kim CC, Swetter SM, Curiel-Lewandrowski C, et al. Addressing the Knowledge Gap in Clinical Recommendations for Management and Complete Excision of Clinically Atypical Nevi/Dysplastic Nevi: Pigmented Lesion Subcommittee Consensus Statement. JAMA dermatology (Chicago, III). 2014;151(2):212-218. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.2694
  • Duffy K, Grossman D. The dysplastic nevus: from historical perspective to management in the modern era: part II. Molecular aspects and clinical management. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67(1):19.e1-32. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2012.03.013
  • Clark WH, Reimer RR, Greene M, Ainsworth AM, Mastrangelo MJ. Origin of Familial Malignant Melanomas From Heritable Melanocytic Lesions: The B-K Mole Syndrome. Archives of dermatology (1960). 1978;114(5):732-738. doi:10.1001/archderm.1978.01640170032006