Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.

  • Presentation

Evidence-Based Digital Tools in Healthcare: AI Scribes, Cybersecurity, and In-Basket Management

Description

The speaker, Vinodhan Abudiri, discussed evidence-based digital tools in healthcare, focusing on AI scribes, cybersecurity, and in-basket management. He emphasized that AI is already widely used by physicians and is increasingly expected to support tasks like research summarization, chart summaries, discharge instructions, and other documentation, but warned that clinicians must preserve and deepen their core clinical skills to avoid overreliance and skill loss. For digital scribes, he described ambient AI documentation tools that capture encounters and generate notes quickly, noting strong evidence for improved clinician satisfaction, reduced pajama time, and meaningful workflow gains, while also pointing out limitations such as poor handling of non-English encounters, integration challenges, and cost. He argued that AI scribes may also help practices defend against AI-driven insurance downcoding by improving documentation accuracy. In the cybersecurity section, he highlighted that breaches are common, often due to human error, and stressed practical safeguards such as risk assessment, firewalls, antivirus protection, HIPAA-compliant systems, staff training, strong passwords, locking devices, backing up data, and keeping software updated. For in-basket management, he explained that message volume surged during and after the pandemic, worsening physician burnout, and presented AI-generated draft replies as a promising way to save time without replacing clinician judgment. He closed by encouraging physicians to adopt technology thoughtfully, use available evidence and resources, and advocate for their own well-being while embracing tools that can reduce administrative burden.

View more

Conclusions

  • AI is rapidly becoming routine in clinical practice, with most physicians already using it professionally and expecting broader use soon for documentation, summaries, instructions, and administrative tasks.
  • Digital scribes and ambient clinical documentation appear to improve clinician satisfaction, reduce pajama time, and lower documentation burden, making them a practical and scalable practice-enhancement strategy.
  • The strongest case for AI scribes is not only efficiency but also financial and workflow value, especially in systems facing rising costs and limited reimbursement.
  • However, AI documentation tools have important limitations, including poor handling of non-English encounters, variable EHR integration, and startup costs that practices must weigh carefully.
  • Dermatology practices should view AI-enabled documentation as a tool to preserve clinical value in an environment where payers are also increasingly using AI to scrutinize and downcode claims.
  • Cybersecurity is a major and growing threat to dermatology and healthcare more broadly, with breaches affecting large numbers of patients and often arising from human error rather than sophisticated attacks alone.
  • Basic security practices such as strong passwords, two-factor authentication, locked workstations, updated software, backups, encrypted systems, and staff education are essential and high-yield.
  • Maintaining a culture of cybersecurity awareness is as important as technical safeguards, because every member of a practice can either reduce or increase vulnerability.
  • Inbox and portal messaging have become a major source of clinician burden and burnout, with EHR time and message volume rising substantially after the pandemic.
  • AI-generated draft replies and inbox assistants can save substantial clinician time and reduce burden, but they should be used as decision-support tools rather than fully autonomous replacements for clinician judgment.
  • Patient portal overload is a real well-being issue, and practices may need both technology and boundary-setting to protect clinician sustainability and humanity.
  • Overall, the presentation argues that evidence-based technology can improve dermatology practice, but it should be adopted thoughtfully, with attention to workflow, safety, privacy, and clinician well-being.
  • Ghatnekar S, Faletsky A, Nambudiri VE. Digital scribes in dermatology: Implications for practice. JAAD. March 2022.#10.1016/j.jaad.2021.11.011
  • Cao DY, Silkey JR, Decker MC, Wanat KA. Artificial intelligence-driven digital scribes in clinical documentation: Pilot study assessing the impact on dermatologist workflow and patient encounters. JAAD International. 2024;15:149-151.#10.1016/j.jdin.2024.02.009
  • Dai T, Kvedar JC, Polsky D. Policy brief: ambient AI scribes and the coding arms race. npj Digital Medicine.#10.1038/s41746-025-02272-z
  • Indian Dermatol Online J. 2025 Dec 18;17(1):164-165. When the Firewall Fails: A Digital Wake-Up Call for Dermatology.#10.4103/idoj.idoj_504_25
  • Artificial Intelligence-Generated Draft Replies to Patient Inbox Messages. JAMA Network Open. March 20, 2024.#10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3201
  • Trends in Physician Electronic Health Record Time and Message Volume. JAMA Internal Medicine. February 24, 2025.#10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.8138
  • Protecting your dermatology practice from cyber threats: tips and tricks for everyday safety. Archives of Dermatological Research. 2024-11-09.#10.1007/s00403-024-03492-1