Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.

  • Presentation

Dermoscopy Diagnosis of Facial and Acral Melanoma

Description

The talk reviews dermoscopic diagnosis of melanoma on the face and acral skin. For facial lesions, the key teaching point is that facial dermoscopy follows different rules than trunk or extremity lesions because normal facial nevi show a pseudo-network rather than a regular pigment network. Suspicious facial melanoma, especially lentigo maligna, tends to track along hair follicles and shows gray dots in an annular-granular pattern, asymmetric follicular openings, rhomboidal or angulated structures, and later homogenous blotches that can obliterate follicular openings. The speaker emphasizes that no single feature is perfectly specific, since pigmented actinic keratoses and other lesions can mimic melanoma, so the whole lesion and combination of features matter. Dermoscopy can also guide biopsy site selection on broad facial lesions, allowing a shallow shave from the most concerning area rather than removing everything at once. For acral melanoma, the second speaker explains that the critical distinction is between pigment on ridges versus furrows: ridge pigmentation is concerning for melanoma, while furrow pigmentation is usually benign. Benign acral patterns include parallel furrow, lattice-like, and fibrillar patterns, with special considerations for congenital nevi such as crista dotted and peas-in-a-pod patterns. The acral algorithm recommends biopsy for a parallel ridge pattern or melanoma-specific features, and if the pattern is non-typical, using the BRAAFF scoring system and lesion size; lesions over 7 mm or with concerning features should be biopsied, while smaller equivocal lesions can be monitored closely. The talk also notes important exceptions, including hemorrhage, exogenous pigment, drug-related pigmentation, and lesions in darker skin, where clinical context, evolution, and size remain important.

View more

Conclusions

  • Facial dermoscopy follows different diagnostic rules than non-facial skin, because benign nevi on the face often show a pseudo-network rather than a regular pigment network.
  • For lentigo maligna on the face, the key dermoscopic clue is pigment tracking down hair follicles, producing features such as annular-granular gray dots, asymmetric follicular openings, rhomboidal structures, and homogeneous blotches.
  • Gray dots alone are not specific for melanoma, so their distribution and associated follicular patterns matter more than their mere presence.
  • Pigmented actinic keratosis and lentigo maligna can look very similar dermoscopically, so diagnosis often depends on combining multiple features rather than relying on a single sign.
  • When facial pigment hugs or thickens around follicular openings in an asymmetric, geometric, or rhomboidal way, melanoma becomes much more likely.
  • Homogeneous areas or blotches that progressively obscure follicular openings are a strong sign of more advanced facial melanoma.
  • Multiple melanoma-associated dermoscopic features can coexist in the same lesion, and seeing several of them together increases diagnostic confidence.
  • A lone suspicious lesion on otherwise relatively clear facial skin should raise concern, even if the lesion is subtle clinically.
  • On acral skin, pigmentation on the ridges is concerning for melanoma, whereas pigmentation in the furrows is usually benign.
  • The parallel ridge pattern is the most important acral melanoma clue and is generally an indication for biopsy.
  • If an acral lesion does not show parallel ridge pattern, typical benign patterns such as parallel furrow, lattice-like, and fibrillar patterns support reassurance rather than biopsy.
  • The fibrillar pattern is usually a modified parallel furrow pattern, but on the palm it should be treated with extra caution and often biopsied.
  • The BRAAFF scoring approach can help stratify non-typical acral lesions, and a score of one or more supports biopsy.
  • Acral melanoma often becomes easier to recognize as it advances because it develops conventional melanoma-specific structures and multiple-component patterns.
  • Not all parallel ridge pattern lesions are melanoma, because congenital acral nevi, hemorrhage, exogenous pigment, and some skin-of-color lesions can mimic it.
  • Subcorneal hemorrhage can mimic acral melanoma, but paring or scraping that makes the lesion disappear supports blood rather than malignancy.
  • In skin of color, acral lesions may not fit standard algorithms perfectly, so lesion size and evolution become especially important.
  • Congenital acral nevi can look atypical and change over time, but this is often normal and pediatric acral melanoma is rare.
  • The overall approach to acral lesions is to first look for parallel ridge pattern, then for benign typical patterns, then for melanoma-specific structures, and finally use size and follow-up when the diagnosis remains uncertain.
  • Across both facial and acral sites, the central conclusion is that pattern recognition, lesion context, and combining several dermoscopic clues are more reliable than any single feature alone.
  • Lallas et al., Clinics in Dermatology, 2014.
  • Schiffner et al., J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000.
  • Uhara H. et al. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145:1331-1332.
  • Saida T, et al. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2022;12(03):e2022123.
  • Elmas OF, Akdeniz N. Northern Clinics of Istanbul. 2019.
  • Zalaudek et al., 2004.
  • Madankumar et al. JAAD 2016.
  • Manci et al. DPC Journal 2022.
  • Moscarella E. et al., BJD 2015.
  • Minagawa A. et al. Arch Dermatol 2011;147:809-813.
  • Han et al. Nature 2020.
  • Nassar et al. JDDS 2021.