Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.

  • Presentation

Decisions on Biologic Switching and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for HS

Description

The presentation focused on biologic treatments and therapeutic drug monitoring for patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). It opened with a case study of a biologic-naive patient with stage 3 HS and breast cancer, discussing treatment options including the FDA-approved biologics adalimumab and secukinumab. The speaker emphasized the importance of individualizing biologic therapy based on patient characteristics, history of therapies, and the pharmacokinetic profiles of medications. Common reasons for treatment failure include disease mechanisms, rapid clearance, and immune-mediated reactions such as antibody formation. Therapeutic drug monitoring is essential to understand why a treatment may cease to be effective, prompting evaluations of medication levels and antibody presence. The discussion highlighted that levels required for effective treatment in HS may differ from other inflammatory diseases, with higher thresholds needed for optimal response. Switching between biologics or adjusting dosing can be necessary for patients who lose therapeutic response. A second case illustrated the possibility of increasing the dose of adalimumab for an initial responder who lost efficacy. The speaker then discussed strategies for rescuing medications that patients need to persist on due to other comorbidities. The presentation also touched on insurance complications and the benefits of recognizing comorbid conditions to facilitate drug approval. It concluded by encouraging the use of resources for prior authorization to aid in treatment accessibility.

View more

Conclusions

  • Two biologic medications, adalimumab and secukinumab, are FDA approved for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS).
  • Choosing between biologics should consider patient-specific factors such as contraindications, comorbidities, and response speed.
  • Therapeutic drug monitoring can clarify the causes of treatment failure for biologics in HS.
  • Common reasons for loss of response include disease mechanism, rapid clearance, and immune-mediated pharmacokinetic failure.
  • Elevating the dose of adalimumab may be beneficial for patients showing initial response but later experiencing loss of efficacy.
  • Higher trough levels (greater than 15 mcg/mL) of adalimumab may be required for optimal healing in HS patients compared to lower levels for other conditions.
  • Switching to infliximab or another class of medication may be indicated for patients with high anti-drug antibodies against adalimumab.
  • Early initiation of infliximab or golimumab may be considered in patients with severe HS who have failed other therapies.
  • N Engl J Med 2016; 375:422-434
  • JAMA Dermatol. 2022;158(2):184-188
  • Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2018;11:1756283X75035
  • Ann Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan-Feb; 35(1): 1-7
  • Gastroenterology. 017 Sep;153(3):827-834
  • Dermatology. 2020;236(1):25-30
  • Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;32(1):32.
  • Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;45(7):933. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
  • JAAD. 2021; 86(5) 1092
  • Frontiers in Immunology. 2020 Aug 18;11:1951
  • Drugs. 2017 Mar;77:363-77.
  • BioDrugs. 2021 Nov;35:715-33.
  • JAAD. MAY 1, 2020. 82(5) ; P1094-1101
  • Lancet. 2023; 401(10378) 747-761