Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.
- Presentation
Decisions on Biologic Switching and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Description
In a detailed discussion, Dr. Alex Cerro presents strategies for selecting and switching biologic treatments for patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS), emphasizing the importance of individualized care due to the lack of head-to-head trials among existing FDA-approved therapies: adalimumab, secukinumab, and vimikizumab. He highlights the significance of recognizing loss of response to treatments, discussing common reasons such as disease progression, the need for higher dosages, or development of antibodies against the medications. Dr. Cerro advocates for therapeutic drug monitoring to assess drug levels and guide decisions on increasing doses or switching therapies when necessary. He underscores the urgency of considering patient comorbidities, treatment speed preferences, and insurance coverage in choosing treatments. Two case studies illustrate the practical application of these concepts; one involved a patient successfully escalated on adalimumab after demonstrating low drug levels, while another case described the switch to a JAK inhibitor after the patient developed antibodies to their TNF inhibitor. Dr. Cerro encourages proactive management, including potential off-label use of existing therapies where justified, while addressing the systemic barriers posed by insurance prior authorization processes. He concludes by noting ongoing developments in HS treatments and urges the importance of comprehensive patient evaluation to optimize care.
View moreConclusions
- Three FDA-approved biologics are available for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS).
- There are currently no head-to-head studies or established guidelines for choosing the best biologic.
- Treatment decisions should consider comorbid conditions, disease severity, patient age, and immunosuppressive risks.
- Adalimumab has a shorter median time to discontinuation compared to other biologics, leading to frequent loss of response.
- Therapeutic drug monitoring can help identify reasons for loss of response to biologics, including disease mechanisms, rapid clearance, and immune-mediated pharmacokinetic failure.
- Increased dosing of adalimumab may restore its effectiveness in patients who initially responded but then lost efficacy.
- Infliximab shows promise for high-dose, high-frequency treatment in severe cases, especially for heavier patients.
- Biologics from different classes may be necessary when a patient develops antibodies against their current treatment.
- N Engl J Med 2016; 375:422-434
- The Lancet 403, no. 10443 (2024): 2504-2519.
- The Lancet, 401(10378), 747-761.
- JAMA Dermatol. 2022;158(2):184-188
- Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, Volume 46, Issue 5, 1 July 2021, Pages
- Gastroenterology. 017 Sep;153(3):827-834
- BioDrugs. 2021 Nov;35:715-33.
- JAAD. 2021; 86(5) 1092
- Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;45(7):933. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
- Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;32(1):32.
- Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2019;25(1):150.
- Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2018;11:1756283X75035
- Drugs. 2017 Mar;77:363-77.
- Dermatology. 2020;236(1):25-30
- Frontiers in Immunology. 2020 Aug 18;11:1951
- Gut. 2012 Dec;61(12):1693-700
- JAMA Dermatol 2021 Nov 1;157(11):1279-1288.