Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.
- Presentation
Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Risk Stratification, Staging, and the Immunotherapy Revolution
Description
The talk reviews rapidly evolving management of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, emphasizing the growing disease burden, the importance of accurate staging, and how risk stratification guides additional workup and treatment. It compares AJCC-8, Brigham and Women, and NCCN systems, noting that Brigham and Women may better identify truly high-risk tumors, while AI-based and gene-expression approaches may eventually improve prognostication. The speaker discusses when to consider imaging, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and multidisciplinary care, especially for high-risk and immunosuppressed patients. A major focus is the immunotherapy revolution: PD-1/PD-L1 agents such as cemiplimab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and cosibelumab have shown meaningful response rates in advanced disease, with C-POST establishing adjuvant cemiplimab after surgery and radiation as standard for very high-risk cases. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy is also promising for borderline resectable tumors. The lecture highlights challenges in transplant recipients and other immunosuppressed patients, plus prevention strategies like field therapy, nicotinamide, and acitretin. Future directions include biomarkers, tumor microenvironment studies, circulating tumor DNA, intralesional therapy, and combination regimens.
View moreConclusions
- Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma is an increasingly common and clinically important cancer, especially in older and immunosuppressed patients, so accurate risk stratification is essential.
- Among current staging approaches, BWH staging appears more specific for identifying high-risk disease than AJCC staging, and higher-risk subsets such as BWH T2b/T3 and AJCC-8 T3 are most associated with poor outcomes.
- Risk stratification may improve by refining how perineural invasion is defined, since extensive or symptomatic perineural spread seems more prognostically important than incidental nerve caliber alone.
- AI-based and gene-expression-based tools may outperform traditional staging systems in predicting aggressive cSCC and could become useful adjuncts for treatment planning.
- High-risk cSCC should generally prompt more intensive workup, including consideration of imaging and sentinel lymph node biopsy, because clinical exam alone can miss occult nodal disease.
- Imaging is helpful for detecting nodal, bony, and perineural spread, with modality choice depending on the suspected pattern of invasion, and abnormal imaging findings should be confirmed with biopsy.
- Management of high-risk cSCC is best handled with a multidisciplinary approach that combines complete surgical clearance with selective adjuvant radiation, systemic therapy, and close follow-up.
- Routine adjuvant radiation after negative margins remains uncertain, and the decision should be individualized based on tumor features and patient factors.
- Checkpoint immunotherapy has transformed advanced cSCC treatment, with cemiplimab, pembrolizumab, and cosibelimab now providing meaningful response rates.
- The C-POST trial established adjuvant cemiplimab after surgery and radiation as a standard option for very high-risk cSCC by substantially reducing recurrence or death.
- Neoadjuvant immunotherapy is an emerging strategy that can shrink tumors before surgery, improve pathologic response, and may allow less morbid or even organ-preserving surgery in selected patients.
- Immunotherapy in solid-organ transplant recipients remains challenging because of graft-rejection risk, but carefully selected patients may still benefit from treatment.
- Field cancerization control and chemoprevention remain important, with topical field therapy, nicotinamide, and acitretin helping reduce future skin cancer burden in high-risk patients.
- Future progress is likely to come from biomarkers, circulating tumor DNA, intralesional therapy, and combination immunotherapy strategies that better tailor treatment to tumor biology.
- JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Apr;149(4):402-10.
- NCCN Guidelines Version 2.2026.
- JAMA Dermatol. 2025 Jun 1;161(6):597-604.
- JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Aug 1;153(8):781-788.
- JAMA Dermatol. 2023 Dec 1;159(12):1332-1338.
- JAMA Dermatol. 2025 Aug 1;161(8):796-804.
- JAMA Dermatol. 150 (2014), pp. 19-24.
- Laryngoscope. 2021 Jan;131(1):E170-E175.
- Dermatol Surg. 2020 Jul;46(7):857-862.
- J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Feb;76(2):217-225.
- Dermatol Surg. 2024 Aug 1;50(8):705-709.
- JAMA Dermatol. 2022 Feb 1;158(2):151-159.
- Lancet Oncol. 2020 Feb;21(2):294-305.
- N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 26;379(4):341-351.
- Ann Oncol. 2021 Oct;32(10):1276-1285.
- J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jan 22: JCO2301498.
- Nat Med. 2025 Dec;31(12):4055-4064.