Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.

  • Presentation

Cutaneous Lymphoma or Not? Clonality as a Helpful Adjunct

Description

The discussion primarily revolves around the role of clonality studies in diagnosing cutaneous lymphoma, specifically mycosis fungoides (MF). The speaker introduces a case of a patient with a history of MF who developed a new rash following treatment, raising questions about treatment efficacy and potential disease progression. The case highlights the importance of immunostains, specifically CD3 and CD8, in examining tissue samples. The presentation emphasizes the difference between PCR and next-generation sequencing (NGS) for clonality studies, noting that while PCR is more widely used, NGS offers superior sensitivity and specificity in detecting monoclonality associated with malignancies. Common misconceptions about clonality are addressed, clarifying that clonality does not equate to malignancy and that benign inflammatory conditions can also present clonally. The speaker describes the mechanics of T-cell receptor gene rearrangement relevant to clonality assessment and details the processes involved in both PCR and NGS approaches. While PCR is effective, it's limited by interobserver variability and reduced sensitivity in early-stage disease. In contrast, NGS, while more complex and expensive, enables better tracking of clonal evolution over time and is effective in predicting disease progression. Ultimately, both methods serve as adjuncts, reinforcing the need for a comprehensive clinical and histopathological evaluation in diagnosing cutaneous lymphomas.

View more

Conclusions

  • Clonality analysis is an important tool in diagnosing cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), but it is not definitive on its own.
  • Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is more sensitive and specific than PCR-based methods for CTCL diagnosis.
  • PCR-based clonality tests can yield false positives in benign inflammatory diseases, highlighting the need for careful interpretation of results.
  • Dual clonality, or matching clones across different skin sites, can increase specificity in diagnosing CTCL.
  • Establishing a baseline malignant clone prior to therapy helps distinguish treatment-related rashes from disease recurrence.
  • Clinicians must integrate clinical, histological, and molecular data to accurately diagnose and manage cutaneous lymphomas.
  • Hirotsu KE, et al. JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Jun 1;157(6):700-707.
  • Wang JY, et al. Am J Surg Pathol. 2020 Dec;44(12):1666-1676.
  • Matos et al. JID 2017.
  • Dewar et al. Arch Pathol Lab Med (2015) 139 (3): 338-350.
  • Wood et al. J Invest Dermatol, 103 (1994), pp. 34-41.
  • Ponti et al. Br J Dermatol, 153 (2005), pp. 565-573.
  • Delfau-Larue et al. J Pathol, 184 (1998), pp. 185-190.
  • Whittaker et al. Cancer, 68 (1991), pp. 1572-1582.
  • Lukowsky A et al. J Invest Dermatol, 115 (2000), pp. 254-259.
  • Bergman et al. J Am Acad Dermatol, 39 (1998), pp. 554-559.
  • Schiller et al. Arch Dermatol Res, 292 (2000), pp. 568-569.
  • Dereure O. et al. Arch Dermatol, 136 (2000), pp. 1483-1486.
  • Shieh S et al. Arch Dermatol, 137 (2001), pp. 305-308.
  • S.E. Thurber et al. J Am Acad Dermatol, 57 (2007), pp. 782-790.
  • Sufficool KE et al, J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Aug;73(2):228-36.e2.
  • Kirsch IR, et al. Sci Transl Med. 2015 Oct 7;7(308):308ra158.
  • Adele de Masson et al., Sci. Transl. Med. 10, eaar5894 (2018) 9 May 2018.
  • Rojansky R, et al. Diagn Pathol. 2020 Sep 28;15(1):122.
  • Raghavan SS et al. J Cutan Pathol. 2022 Mar;49(3):252-260.
  • Monter A, Nomdedéu JF. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2019 Jul;19(7):571-578.
  • Comfere N, et al J Cutan Pathol. 2018 Jan;45(1):39-47.