Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.

  • Presentation

Cutaneous Lymphoma or Not? A Clinicopathologic Approach to Diagnosis

Description

The session discusses a clinical-pathologic approach to diagnosing cutaneous lymphoma, focusing on the complexities and variabilities associated with it, particularly mycosis fungoides (MF), the most common type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. The speaker highlights how the variability in clinical presentations and histopathological findings can make diagnosis challenging, emphasizing the need for integrating clinical history, immunohistochemistry, and molecular studies. Several cases illustrate these challenges, showcasing patients with differing symptoms and pathologic findings that complicate diagnosis, such as a patient with CD8+ T cells mimicking MF or a case where lichen sclerosus was misdiagnosed. The speaker stresses the importance of thorough clinical evaluation, repeat biopsies when necessary, and maintaining a broad differential to avoid missing a lymphoma diagnosis or mistaking it for benign conditions. Diagnostic uncertainty is acknowledged as an inherent part of clinical practice, advocating for continuous monitoring and follow-up to refine diagnoses as conditions evolve. Overall, the key message is the interplay between various diagnostic tools within the clinical context to achieve accurate diagnoses.

View more

Conclusions

  • The diagnosis of cutaneous lymphoma, specifically Mycosis Fungoides (MF), relies on a multidisciplinary integration of clinical, histopathologic, and molecular findings.
  • There exists significant variation in the clinical presentation and immunophenotype of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL), complicating diagnosis.
  • Clinical history and examination are crucial components in identifying cutaneous lymphoma and should not be overlooked.
  • Molecular studies, while useful, should be interpreted alongside clinical and histopathologic findings because benign conditions can mimic CTCL.
  • Not all atypical lymphoid infiltrates indicate CTCL or MF; benign mimics must be considered in the differential diagnosis.
  • Longitudinal follow-up is essential in diagnosing cutaneous lymphomas, as disease characteristics can evolve over time.
  • Diagnostic uncertainty is inherent in the diagnosis of cutaneous lymphoma and should be openly communicated and monitored by clinicians and pathologists.
  • Willemze, R. et al. Blood. 2019 Apr 18;133(16):1703-1714.
  • Hodak E et al. CD4/CD8 double-negative epidermotropic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: an immunohistochemical variant of mycosis fungoides. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006 Aug;55(2):276-84.
  • El Shabrawi-Caelen et al. Hypopigmented mycosis fungoides. Frequent expression of a CD8+ T-cell phenotype. Am J Surg Pathol 2002; 26:450-7.
  • Massone C. et al. The prognosis of early mycosis fungoides is not influenced by phenotype and T-cell clonality Br J Dermatol, 159 (2008), pp. 881-886.
  • Joan Guitart et al. Primary cutaneous aggressive epidermotropic cytotoxic T-cell lymphomas: reappraisal of a provisional entity in the 2016 WHO classification of cutaneous lymphomas. Mod Pathol. 2017 May;30(5):761-772.
  • Lukowsky A et al. Detection of expanded T cell clones in skin biopsy samples of patients with lichen sclerosus et atrophicus by T cell receptor-gamma polymerase chain reaction assays. J Invest Dermatol. 2000 Aug;115(2):254-9.
  • Magro C et al. Pityriasis lichenoides: a clonal T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder. Hum Pathol. 2002 Aug;33(8):788-95.
  • Schiller Pl et al. Detection of clonal T cells in lichen planus. Arch Dermatol Res. 2000 Nov;292(11):568-9.
  • Sugerman PB et al. Clonal expansion of lymphocytes from oral lichen planus lesions. J Oral Pathol Med. 1993 Mar;22(3):126-31.