Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.
- Presentation
CSCC Workup, Staging, and Prognostics
Description
In a presentation by Dr. Vishal Patel from the George Washington University Cancer Center, he discusses the workup, staging, and prognostics of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). He emphasizes the importance of identifying patient factors that determine tumor risk profiles, including the complexities of the staging systems used in practice. Dr. Patel categorizes tumors into low, moderate, high, and very high-risk groups, focusing on recurrence rather than metastasis and death. He highlights the different staging systems, notably the AJCC and Brigham and Women's, and discusses recent refinements in risk stratifications, particularly regarding perineural invasion as a critical factor. Additionally, he notes the significance of gene expression profiling as an evolving tool in clinical decision-making, emphasizing its role in identifying high-risk cases that need further intervention. He encourages a multidisciplinary approach for managing locally advanced SCC and the necessity of communicating risk factors effectively among different oncology specialists. Dr. Patel concludes that while staging systems serve as a foundational step, understanding individual patient characteristics and applying genetic information judiciously are essential for optimizing treatment outcomes and patient care.
View moreConclusions
- Patient factors significantly influence the risk profiles of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC).
- Staging systems for CSCC have notable shortcomings, particularly regarding risk stratification.
- Gene expression profiling (GEP) can identify high-risk patients and is a complementary tool to traditional staging.
- Extensive perineural invasion (ePNI) is a critical risk factor in determining outcomes for CSCC patients.
- Immunosuppressed patients face significantly higher risks of poor outcomes from CSCC compared to immunocompetent patients.
- There is a lack of consensus among specialists on the definitions and implications of various risk factors for CSCC.
- The Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) staging system is preferred by dermatologists over the AJCC system, yet many oncologists primarily use AJCC.
- Overall utilization of staging systems among specialists is low, indicating a need for further training and standardization in CSCC management.
- JAMA Dermatol. 2023;159(7):728-735. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.1353
- Conde-Ferreiros A et al. Definition of prognostic subgroups in the T3 stage of the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Tentative T3 stage subclassification. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Apr 9;S0190-9622(20)30511-9.
- Dong J. Risk factors for recurrent and metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in immunocompromised patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Nov;83(5):1473-1475.
- Wysong et al. Validation of a 40-gene expression profile test to predict metastatic risk in localized high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Feb;84(2):361-369.
- Ibrahim S et al. Enhanced metastatic risk assessment in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with the 40-gene expression profile test. Future Oncol. 2022;18(7):833-846.