Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.
- Presentation
Contact Urticaria with Practical Implementation in a Contact Dermatitis Clinic
Description
Doug Powell from the University of Utah presented a detailed overview of contact urticaria, emphasizing its significance in a contact dermatitis clinic. His goal is to raise awareness about the condition, encouraging healthcare professionals to identify and test for it more frequently. Contact urticaria is characterized by reactions occurring minutes after skin contact with allergens, categorized into immunologic and non-immunologic responses. Powell highlighted that while immunologic responses are often IgE-mediated, validating specific causal agents is complicated. He discussed the common triggers, which can include a variety of plants, foods, and chemicals often present in patch testing. Powell also referred to a study showing that approximately 10% of occupational skin diseases involve contact urticaria, underscoring its prevalence. He suggested practical methods for evaluation in clinical settings, such as open application tests and prick tests, emphasizing low-risk approaches to assess patient responses. Several case studies illustrated how symptoms can manifest in various scenarios, reaffirming the need for thorough testing, especially in patients with dermatitis or respiratory symptoms. Powell concluded that integrating these evaluations into practice is not only feasible but can also be financially viable, encouraging dermatologists to add contact urticaria assessments into routine examinations.
View moreConclusions
- Contact urticaria is a group of varied reactions that can occur quickly after skin contact with certain substances.
- Both immunologic and non-immunologic factors can cause contact urticaria, emphasizing the complexity of diagnosis.
- Immunologic contact urticaria may lead to chronic dermatitis if exposure continues.
- Common triggers include proteins, metals, preservatives, and small molecular weight chemicals, among others.
- Contact urticaria likely represents a significant portion of occupational skin diseases, particularly among professionals who work with proteins.
- Testing for contact urticaria is underutilized in practice, leading to missed diagnoses in patients.
- Proper evaluation and testing methods for contact urticaria can be integrated into existing patch testing protocols without additional strain on clinic workflow.
- The risk of anaphylaxis during contact urticaria testing is low, and most patients can provide clear histories to guide safe practices.
- Patients with chronic urticaria or contact dermatitis should be evaluated for contact urticaria even if initial patch tests return negative results.
- Incorporating contact urticaria testing can be financially feasible and may enhance patient outcomes.
- Alexander Fisher, 1973
- Barata, An Bras Dermatol, 2013
- VonKrogh, Maibach, '75
- Kanerva, "statistics on Occupational" Cont Urt Synd (1st ed)
- Orb, et al. Prevalence and Interest in the Practice of Scratch testing for contact urticaria Dermatitis 2014. 25(6):366-369.
- Goossens, CD, 2016
- Maibach, Clin Exp Derm, 2010
- Wakelin, Clin Exp Derm, 2001
- Gimenez-Arnau, "CUS: How it is clinically manifested" Cont Urt Syn (2nd ed)
- Isaac, Jahdonna MSc; Goldminz, Ari M. MD; Scheinman, Pamela L. MD Dermatitis: 3/4 2019 - Volume 30 - Issue 2 - p 168-169 doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000441
- Dean, Secrest, Powell in formaldehyde Letters Contact Dermatitis 4. Fransway AF, Zug KA, Belsito DV, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for 2007-2008. Dermatitis 2013;24(1):10-21.
- Van Lerberghe L, Baeck M. A case of acute contact dermatitis induced Contact Urticaria From Occupational Exposure to mucous membranes