Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.

  • Presentation

Confocal Application in Practice: Everyday (CAPE) 2024

Description

In a presentation by Jane Grant Kells from the University of Connecticut, she discusses the advantages of confocal microscopy in dermatology, emphasizing its role as a non-invasive imaging technique that allows for in vivo cellular histology examination from the epidermis to the papillary dermis. Confocal microscopy provides horizontal sections of skin lesions, which offers a more comprehensive view than traditional vertical histology and presents no reported adverse effects. The device uses a diode laser to image layers of skin, with specific patterns and features identified in confocal images that correlate closely with histological findings. Kells, alongside colleagues Harold and Maggie, highlights the educational resources available, including online courses, and stresses that combining dermoscopy and confocal imaging increases diagnostic accuracy. The practical workflow she outlines involves acquiring both dermoscopic and confocal images, enabling immediate analysis and potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies by up to 70%. Kells also mentions the cost-effectiveness of confocal microscopy compared to traditional biopsies, showing significant savings in clinical practice. However, she notes limitations in using confocal microscopy on certain skin types and areas. Ultimately, her enthusiasm reflects a shift towards integrating this advanced technology into daily dermatological practices.

View more

Conclusions

  • Confocal microscopy is a non-invasive imaging technique that offers high-resolution visualization of skin lesions, enhancing diagnostic accuracy.
  • It allows for horizontal sectioning of skin lesions, enabling better evaluation of more tissue in comparison to traditional biopsies.
  • Zero adverse events have been reported during the use of confocal microscopy, making it a safe alternative for in vivo examinations.
  • Confocal microscopy provides a detailed cellular view comparable to histopathology that can improve the understanding of skin conditions and malignancies.
  • Dermoscopy combined with confocal microscopy increases diagnostic sensitivity and specificity significantly, with numbers as high as 98%.
  • The use of confocal microscopy has been shown to reduce unnecessary biopsies by approximately 70%, thus saving healthcare costs.
  • Confocal microscopy can reveal key patterns associated with different skin conditions, such as the honeycomb and cobblestone patterns indicative of normal or atypical skin.
  • Confocal imagery allows dermatopathologists to confirm diagnoses in real-time at the bedside, potentially expediting treatment for patients.
  • The technology also facilitates telemedicine approaches, enabling remote diagnosis and second opinions through digital transmission of images.
  • Despite its advantages, confocal microscopy has limitations in certain anatomical areas such as thick palmoplantar skin and hairy regions where imaging can be obstructed.
  • JAAD 2021;84(1):1-31
  • RCM in Dermatology: Fundamentals and Clinical Application. Editor: S. Gonzalez. 2011
  • Psaty, Halpern. Clin Dermatol 2009;27:35
  • Rajadhyaksha M. JID 1999
  • Guitera, et al. J Invest Dermatol 2009;129(1):131-8.
  • Witkowski, et al. Telediagnosis with confocal microscopy: a reality or a dream? Dermatologic Clinics 2016:34 (4):505-512
  • Castro, Stephens, Fraga-Braghiroli, Oliviero, Rezze, Rabinovitz, Scope. JEADV 2015;29(6):1164-9.
  • Pellacani, Pepe, Casari, Long. Br J Dermatol 2014;171:1044-1051
  • Rao, et al. JAAD 2013;69:e295-300.
  • Giambrone, et al. (Rao). JAAD 2015;73:317-319.
  • Yelamos et.al. JAAD 2020;83(4):1057-1063
  • Binder, et al. Arch Dermatol 1995;131:286
  • Argenziano, et al. Arch Dermatol 1998;134:1563
  • Piccolo, et al. Br J Dermatol 2002;147:481
  • Carli, et al. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2002;16:339
  • Gerger, et al. Br J Dermatol 2008;158:329
  • Rajpara, et al. Br J Dermatol 2009;161:591
  • Guitera et al. JID 2010; 130:2080-2091
  • Farnetani, et al. JAMA Derm 2015;151:1075
  • Pellacani, et al. JEADV 2016;30:413
  • Borsari, et al JAMA Derm 2016;152:1093
  • Menge, et al. JAAD 2016;74:1114
  • Song, Grant-Kels, et al. JAAD 2016;75:1187
  • Pellacani, et al. JAMA Dermatol 2022;158(7):754-761
  • Muzumdar S, Wu R, Rothe MJ, Grant-Kels JM. J Am Acad Dermatol 2022;86(1):209-211