Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.

  • Presentation

Complications of Ablative Resurfacing

Description

In this discussion, Joel Coen addresses the complications associated with ablative resurfacing procedures in dermatologic surgery. He emphasizes his experience with both fractional and full-field erbium and CO2 lasers and explains that while fractional mechanisms may lead to prolonged healing phases, full-field treatments often yield more significant aesthetic improvements. Coen stresses the importance of patient education regarding anticipated post-inflammatory erythema and skin care post-procedure, mentioning specific techniques for managing pain through nerve blocks and nitrous oxide. He highlights the potential for complications such as hypopigmentation, hyperpigmentation, and infection, often arising from patient non-compliance with post-operative instructions like consistent sunscreen application. Furthermore, he notes the rare occurrence of eruptive keratoacanthomas following resurfacing and encourages careful follow-up to monitor these and other potential side effects. Overall, he advocates for a balanced approach in combining ablative and non-ablative treatments to enhance patient outcomes while managing expectations and complications effectively.

View more

Conclusions

  • Full-field erbium laser resurfacing is effective for treating severe dermatoheliosis and etched-in lines.
  • Post-inflammatory erythema is a common and expected outcome after full-field erbium resurfacing, typically lasting several months.
  • Erbium lasers provide faster recovery and lower rates of hypopigmentation compared to CO2 lasers.
  • Combining full-field erbium treatment with neuromodulators and fillers can enhance overall results.
  • Patients often require multiple treatments to achieve desired outcomes, particularly for deeper rhytides.
  • Patient education on expected results and aftercare is crucial for successful treatment outcomes.
  • Monitoring of healing and follow-up visits are essential for optimal recovery after treatment.
  • Maintaining sun protection is necessary to avoid complications such as hyperpigmentation post-resurfacing.
  • 1. Fitzpatrick RE. Laser resurfacing. Adv Dermatol 1997;13:463-501.
  • 2. Sanniec K, Afrooz PN, Burns AJ. Long-term assessment of perioral rhytide correction with erbium: YAG laser resurfacing. Plast Reconstr.
  • 3. Cohen JL. Perioral rejuvenation with ablative erbium resurfacing. J Drugs Dermatol 2015;14:1363-6.
  • 4. Fleming D. Controversies in skin resurfacing: the role of erbium. J Cutan Laser Ther 1999;1:15-21.
  • 5. Worley B, Cohen JL. Combination ablative approach to laser therapy in advanced aging of the face. J Drugs Dermatol 2018;17:796-9.
  • 6. Johnstone MA, Albert DM. Surv Ophthalmol. 2002;47(suppl 1):S185-S202.
  • 7. Tisack A, Fotouhi A, Fidai C, Friedman BJ, Ozog D, Veenstra J. A clinical and biological review of keratoacanthoma. Br J Dermatol.
  • 8. Ambur A, Clark A, Nathoo R. An updated review of the therapeutic management of keratoacanthomas. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol.
  • 9. Meltzer OA, Liem WH, Daines SM. Development of eruptive squamous atypia 2 weeks post fractional carbon dioxide laser resurfacing. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;146(8):766-768.
  • 10. Hoss E, Kollipara R, Goldman MP, Tompkins SD. Eruptive keratoacanthomas in a red tattoo after treatment with a 532-nm picosecond laser. Dermatol Surg. 2020;46(7):973-974.