Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.
- Presentation
Complications from Radiofrequency and Ultrasound Modalities
Description
Dr. Karen Law discusses complications associated with radiofrequency (RF) and ultrasound treatments, drawn from personal experience and studies. She emphasizes the importance of understanding RF mechanisms, particularly regarding tissue impedance and energy transfer, which can lead to adverse effects like swelling, erythema, blistering, and ulceration, especially in older patients or those on blood thinners. She references a multicenter study indicating a low complication rate with monopolar RF but notes specific risks such as burns from grounding pad misuse. The interaction of tattoos and RF is highlighted as a potential risk, showing that energy can behave unpredictably near metallic inks. Dr. Law shares case examples that underscore the necessity for careful patient counseling on potential side effects, as many treatments occur outside dermatology offices. She advises meticulous grounding pad application, addressing any patient discomfort promptly, and suggests using cooling devices correctly to avoid issues like cold panniculitis. For RF microneedling, she warns of grid marks and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation while stressing the need for thorough consent documentation covering burns and ulcerations. Finally, Dr. Law addresses ultrasound safety, particularly the risk of eye injuries and nerve damage, advocating for careful technique and using dental rolls in sensitive areas. Overall, she encourages practitioners to stay informed on potential complications to mitigate risks during these aesthetic treatments.
View moreConclusions
- Radiofrequency devices can lead to complications such as blisters, burns, and scarring, particularly in older patients or those with specific medical conditions.
- Monopolar radiofrequency treatments have a relatively low rate of complications but can result in significant adverse events like ulceration when not performed correctly.
- Careful consideration of patient history, including medications and skin characteristics, is crucial to minimize risks associated with RF treatments.
- It is essential to monitor for signs of excessive heat during RF treatments to prevent burns, especially in areas where skin is thinner, such as around the eyes.
- Proper grounding during RF procedures is necessary to avoid complications related to device malfunction and unexpected energy distribution.
- Ultrasound treatments can also pose risks, particularly eye injuries if the devices are not used with the correct technique.
- Patient consent forms should clearly outline the risks of treatment, including burns and scars, to ensure informed decision-making.
- Cooling mechanisms and adequate gel application can help reduce the risk of burns in RF and ultrasound treatments.
- Lolis MS, Goldberg DJ. Radiofrequency in cosmetic dermatology: a review. Dermatol Surg. 2012 Nov;38(11):1765-76.
- Chung JY, Lee JH. Adverse Events after Noninvasive Radiofrequency Treatment for Cosmetic Uses. Med Lasers. 2015;4(1):16-19. https://doi.org/10.25289/ML.2015.4.1.16
- Nguyen CN, Nguyen QD, Hebert AA, Gold MH. Adverse Events of Non-Invasive Body Contouring: Analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database. Dermatol Surg. 2022 Sep 1;48(9):943-948.
- Saban-Parel A, Ziv M, et al. Complications using intense ultrasound therapy to treat deep dermal facial skin and subcutaneous tissues. Dermatol Surg. 2014 Oct;40(10):1108-12. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000124.
- Friedmann DP, Bourgeois GP, Chan HH, Zedlitz AC, Butterwick KJ. Complications from microfocused transcutaneous ultrasound: Case series and review of the literature. Lasers Surg Med. 2018 Jan;50(1):13-19. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22768. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
- Wichai Hongcharu MDIX, Kanjana Boonchoo MD, MSc, Michael H. Gold MD. The efficacy and safety of the high-intensity parallel beam ultrasound device at the depth of 1.5 mm for skin tightening. First published: 09 February 2023 | https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.15672
- Wu S, Zhang Y, Guo Y, Zhou Z. Adverse reaction of noninsulated microneedle radiofrequency: A case report. J Cosmet Dermatol. First published: 14 December 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.16090.