Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.
- Presentation
Coding and Documentation in Surgical Dermatology
Description
In a presentation on coding and documentation in surgical dermatology, the speaker emphasizes the importance of understanding coding despite EHR systems performing the task. Issues with automated coding are highlighted, as inaccurate coding can lead to inappropriate billing. Important documentation practices include detailing the medical necessity for procedures and clearly documenting actions, such as the extent of undermining in closures. The speaker discusses complex linear closures (CLC), emphasizing that documentation must include specifics about the procedure and rationales for actions taken. It is specified that not all closures warrant CLC billing, especially if there is no justification beyond standard practices. The differences between flaps and regular closures are clarified, along with recommendations for accurate documentation. New developments in ICD-10 coding are also presented, particularly regarding follow-up encounters for malignancies, which simplify documentation processes. Additional considerations include the importance of avoiding coding templates that appear too uniform, as this can trigger audits. Surgeons are encouraged to be mindful of their coding practices to prevent scrutiny from insurers, especially for those deemed outliers in their procedural statistics. The session concludes with a call for dermatologists to improve their understanding of coding in their specialty.
View moreConclusions
- Continuing education in coding and documentation is essential for surgical dermatologists despite EHR systems performing automatic coding.
- The quality of automated coding relies significantly on the programmer's accuracy, necessitating thorough understanding by healthcare practitioners.
- Documentation must explicitly state medical necessity to meet insurer requirements and is not merely descriptive of actions taken during a procedure.
- Understanding detailed updates to documentation requirements, such as the 2020 CLC updates, is crucial for correct billing and coding in complex repairs.
- Accurate documentation of the extent and reasons for procedures like extensive undermining must be included to justify complex linear closures and avoid billing rejections.
- Incorrectly billing complex closures when they are not medically justified poses a risk to practitioners and may attract audit scrutiny from insurers.
- The relationship between billed services depends heavily on accurate procedure documentation, ensuring that coding practices align with insurance guidelines.
- New coding practices, such as for suture removal codes, only apply under specific conditions and cannot be used indiscriminately for all procedures.
- Updated ICD-10 codes facilitate better coding for follow-ups after treatments of malignant neoplasms, emphasizing the importance of using the most current coding system.
- Surgeons should strive for balanced billing patterns to avoid being flagged as outliers, which increases scrutiny from insurance reviewers.
- MLN Matters Number: MM11227
- JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Jun 1;153(6):565-570. Outlier Practice Patterns in Mohs Micrographic Surgery: Defining the Problem and a Proposed Solution. Krishnan A1, Xu T1, Hutfless S2, Park A1, Stasko T3, Vidimos AT4, Leshin B5, Coldiron BM6, Bennett RG7, Marks VJ8, Brandt R8, Makary MA9, Albertini JG10; and the American College of Mohs Surgery Improving Wisely Study Group.