Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.

  • Presentation

Clinical-Pathologic Correlation in Nail Disorders: New Developments in Nail Pathology

Description

The speaker emphasized the close partnership between clinical dermatology and dermatopathology in nail disorders, stressing that high-quality nail biopsies require good photography, precise localization, and appropriate specimen orientation. Examining nails from surface, lateral, and free-margin views helps target biopsies and identify the primary pathology, while nail clippings can be highly diagnostic when properly collected and commented on. Newer concepts highlighted included multiple onychopapillomas as a clue to BAP1 tumor predisposition syndrome, with clinically important guidance to look for additional lesions but not to overinterpret BAP1 staining in onychopapilloma itself. The talk also covered malignant onychopapilloma, atypical or malignant mimics of wart-like or papillomatous nail lesions, and the importance of recognizing atypical parakeratosis in nail clippings as a possible sign of squamous neoplasia. Squamous cell carcinoma of the nail unit was reviewed, including HPV-associated versus non-HPV-related patterns, the need for deeper biopsies when lesions are clinically suspicious, and the fact that pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia can mimic cancer, as shown by a gout case. Proliferating onychomatricoma was presented as a newly described entity that can resemble carcinoma and requires adequate sampling. Finally, the speaker summarized immunohistochemical approaches in nail melanoma and cautioned that melanocyte remnants in nail plates can be seen in children and are not necessarily worrisome.

View more

Conclusions

  • Careful clinical-pathologic correlation is essential in nail disorders, and the best diagnostic yield comes from photographing the nail from surface, lateral, and free-margin views while submitting well-oriented specimens.
  • Multiple onychopapillomas should prompt consideration of BAP1 tumor predisposition syndrome, but onychopapilloma itself does not appear to require BAP1 immunohistochemistry.
  • A painful, draining, enlarging, or otherwise atypical onychopapilloma-like lesion should raise concern for malignant onychopapilloma or another squamous neoplasm rather than being assumed benign.
  • Nail clippings are highly informative and should be routinely examined and reported because they can reveal onychomycosis, psoriasis, melanocytic remnants, onychomatricoma, and occult squamous pathology.
  • Atypical parakeratosis in nail plate or shallow nail biopsies is an important clue that should be reported because it can be associated with nail unit squamous cell carcinoma, though it is not fully specific.
  • Nail unit squamous cell carcinoma often masquerades as a wart or other benign lesion, so refractory wart-like nail disease, lateral nail fold hyperkeratosis, or unexplained onycholysis should prompt biopsy.
  • Shallow or superficial nail biopsies can miss invasive disease, so pathologists should caution clinicians when the specimen is insufficient to exclude squamous cell carcinoma.
  • Nail unit squamous cell carcinoma is frequently HPV-associated, especially in basaloid lesions, and clinicians should consider evaluation for possible genitodigital HPV transmission.
  • Pseudoepitheliomatous or pseudocarcinomatous hyperplasia can mimic nail squamous cell carcinoma, including in gout or other reactive conditions, making deep sampling and careful histology crucial.
  • Proliferating onychomatricoma is a newly recognized benign variant that can resemble squamous neoplasia, but its fibroepithelial stroma and low proliferative profile help distinguish it from nuSCC.
  • For nail unit melanoma, immunostains should be interpreted only in context, with a combination approach preferred when needed because marker performance differs between epithelium and dermis.
  • In longitudinal melanonychia, biopsy decisions must balance risk and benefit, and benign melanocytic activation in children should not be overcalled as melanoma based on nail plate melanocyte remnants alone.
  • Lebensohn A, et al. Multiple onychopapillomas and BAP1 Tumor Predisposition Syndrome. JAMA Derm. 2024;160:837-45.#10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.1804
  • Haneke E, et al. Malignant onychopapilloma. JCP; 48:2021.
  • Stephen A, Tosti A, Rubin AI. Diagnostic Applications in Nail Clippings. Derm Clin. 2015;33:289-301.#10.1016/j.det.2014.12.011
  • Prasad A, Hinshaw MA, et al. Atypical Parakeratosis in Nail Unit SCC. JCP. 2022;49(7):675-7.
  • Song J, Shea CR. Benign vs malignant parakeratosis: a nuclear morphometry study. Mod Pathol. 2010;23(6):799-803.#10.1038/modpathol.2010.52
  • Perrin C, et al. Proliferating onychomatrixoma. Clin, dermatoscopical, and pathologic features of onychomatrixoma new variant resembling onycholemmal/squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Dermatopath. 2020;42:827-34.
  • Jiang AJ, et al. Clinicopathologic challenges & traps in the dx of nail unit melanoma. J Cutan Pathol. 2023;50:580-90.