Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.
- Presentation
Clinical Features, Pathogenesis, and Management Controversies in Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis
Description
The session reviewed Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), emphasizing their clinical features, causes, pathogenesis, prognosis, and management controversies. SJS and TEN are rare, severe hypersensitivity reactions, usually drug-induced, with overlap forms distinguished by the percentage of body surface area involved. Causes may also include infections, immune disorders, toxins, and physical agents, and TEN has been linked to HLA predisposition in different populations. Clinically, SJS often begins with prodromal symptoms and prominent mucosal involvement, especially conjunctival disease, while TEN is marked by widespread pain, erythema, blistering, skin detachment, Nikolsky sign, and possible lung involvement. Histology shows epidermal necrosis with limited inflammatory infiltrate, and immunofluorescence is negative, helping with differential diagnosis. Pathogenesis is centered on a T-cell–mediated delayed hypersensitivity reaction involving CD8 cytotoxic cells, HLA associations, and inflammatory mediators such as TNF-alpha and interferon-gamma that drive keratinocyte apoptosis and necroptosis. Differential diagnoses include autoimmune blistering diseases, vasculitis, Kawasaki disease, erythema multiforme, staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome, linear IgA dermatosis, AGEP, and other erythrodermas. Mortality is about 1–5% for SJS and 25–35% for TEN, though many survivors re-epithelialize within 10–20 days, often with mucosal scarring or pigmentary changes. Management has no standardized guideline and relies on immediate withdrawal of the trigger, hospitalization, monitoring, infection control, and multidisciplinary supportive care. Systemic therapies such as corticosteroids, IVIG, cyclosporine, and TNF-alpha blockers remain controversial, and in TEN there is also debate over surgical debridement versus conservative care using the detached skin as a biologic dressing.
View moreConclusions
- Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis are rare but life-threatening severe hypersensitivity reactions, most often drug-induced and distinguished largely by the extent of skin detachment.
- SJS/TEN likely exist on a disease spectrum with erythema multiforme and involve T-cell–mediated, HLA-associated keratinocyte apoptosis and necroptosis.
- Supportive care and rapid withdrawal of the suspected trigger are the most consistently accepted management steps across SJS/TEN.
- Topical and systemic treatments for SJS/TEN remain controversial because no standardized evidence-based treatment guideline exists.
- Multidisciplinary hospitalization is essential, with careful monitoring for sepsis, fluid-electrolyte imbalance, and multi-organ involvement.
- Clinical severity and prognosis worsen with larger body surface area detachment, especially in TEN, which carries substantially higher mortality than SJS.
- SCORTEN is a key prognostic tool for TEN and correlates higher scores with markedly increased risk of death.
- Early recognition of mucosal, ocular, respiratory, and systemic involvement is important because these features contribute to complications and poor outcomes.
- Differential diagnosis is broad and includes autoimmune blistering diseases, erythema multiforme, staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome, AGEP, GVHD, and other severe dermatologic emergencies.
- Most survivors re-epithelialize, but lasting sequelae such as mucosal scarring, dyspigmentation, nail changes, and other chronic complications are common.
- Lyell A. Br J Dermatol 1956; 68(11): 355–361
- Roujeau JC, et al; N Engl J Med 1995;333:1600-1608
- Huff JC. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1983;8:763
- Sukasem et al., Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2018;19:329-353
- Satoh TK et al., J Dermatol 2024;51(1):3-11
- Shah H, et al. Am J Clin Dermatol 25, 891–908
- Viard-Leveugle I, et al. J Invest Dermatol 2013;133(2):489-98
- Garel B, Oro S, et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Mar;85(3):570-579
- Revue J, et al. Arch Dermatol 1987;123(9):1160-5
- Ingen-Housz-Oro S, et al. J Invest Dermatol 2025; 145(7):1589-1603
- Shah H, et al. Am J Clin Dermatol 2024;25, 891-908