Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.
- Presentation
Clinical Clues, Testing, and Diagnosis of VEXAS Syndrome
Description
The talk explains when to suspect VEXAS syndrome and how to test for it. Key clinical clues include older age, especially men over 50, recurrent fevers, inflammatory symptoms, skin findings such as Sweet syndrome-like neutrophilic dermatosis, vasculitis, chondritis, or tender nodules, and poor response or dependence on corticosteroids despite failed steroid-sparing agents. Other red flags are elevated inflammatory markers, macrocytic anemia or other cytopenias, myelodysplastic syndrome or plasma cell dyscrasia, pulmonary or ocular involvement, and thrombosis in the setting of autoinflammation or marrow abnormalities. Bone marrow vacuolization is a classic clue but is neither sensitive nor specific, and skin biopsies may show neutrophilic or histiocytoid dermatoses or even lupus-like patterns. The speaker emphasizes that clinical combinations can strongly raise pretest probability, and expert guidance supports testing most strongly in older men with inflammatory and hematologic abnormalities. UBA1 testing is usually done on peripheral blood or bone marrow by NGS, digital droplet PCR, or Sanger sequencing, with NGS preferred for broader coverage and lower variant allele fractions. If initial testing is negative but suspicion remains high, more sensitive or expanded testing is recommended. The talk closes by noting that some patients with VEXAS-like inflammation may have other clonal mutations, such as IDH, and may respond to targeted therapy.
View moreConclusions
- VEXAS testing should be strongly considered in older adults, especially men over 50, who present with systemic inflammation, cytopenias, and steroid-responsive but relapsing disease.
- The combination of recurrent fevers, elevated CRP/ESR, macrocytic anemia or other cytopenias, and neutrophilic skin disease or chondritis is particularly suggestive of VEXAS.
- Concurrent or sequential overlap of morphologies such as Sweet-like neutrophilic dermatosis, vasculitis, and chondritis increases suspicion for a clonal autoinflammatory syndrome.
- Treatment resistance to conventional steroid-sparing agents is a major clue, because many VEXAS patients remain corticosteroid dependent despite multiple therapies.
- Thrombosis, especially unprovoked venous thromboembolism in a patient with inflammatory or marrow abnormalities, should prompt consideration of UBA1 testing.
- Pulmonary, musculoskeletal, and ocular involvement are common enough to support the diagnosis when they occur alongside the core hematologic and inflammatory features.
- Bone marrow vacuolization is a classic pathologic clue, but its absence does not exclude VEXAS and its presence is not fully specific.
- Skin biopsies can provide useful clues, including neutrophilic dermatitis, histiocytoid Sweet syndrome, leukocytoclasia, perieccrine inflammation, and sometimes mucinous or lupus-like patterns.
- The pretest probability of VEXAS rises substantially when demographic risk, inflammatory markers, cytopenias, and compatible clinical morphology are present together.
- Although VEXAS is X-linked and enriched in men, women can also carry UBA1 variants and may develop disease in settings such as monosomy X or other loss of X-function states.
- Population data suggest incomplete penetrance of VEXAS-defining UBA1 variants, meaning that carrying the mutation does not always produce clinically evident disease.
- Standard tests may miss low-level or non-exon 3 variants, so negative Sanger or targeted exon 3 assays should be followed by more sensitive or broader sequencing when suspicion remains high.
- Next-generation sequencing of peripheral blood, bone marrow, or affected tissue is often the most practical approach, with digital droplet PCR useful for low variant allele fractions.
- VEXAS-like inflammatory syndromes can also arise from other clonal myeloid mutations, such as IDH-mutated neoplasms, so broader clonal evaluation may be warranted when UBA1 testing is negative.
- Beck DB, Ferrada MA, Sikora KA, et al. N Engl J Med. 2020; NEJMoa2026834.
- Georgin-Lavialle S, Terrier B, Guedon AF, et al. Br J Dermatol. 2021; bjd.20805.
- Corty, Brogan, Byram, Springer, Grayson, and Bick. Arthritis & Rheumatology, 2024.
- Nicholson LT, Cowen EW, Beck D, Ferrada M, Madigan LM. JID Innov. 2024;4(1):100242.
- Sakuma M, Tanimura A, Yasui S, et al. Rheumatology. 2021;60(10):e356-e359.
- Obiorah IE, Patel BA, Groarke EM, et al. Blood Adv. 2021;5(16):3203.
- Koster and colleagues from Mayo Clinic Proceedings.
- Tan IJ, Ferrada MA, Ahmad S, et al. JAMA Dermatol. 2024;160(8):822.
- Ribereau-Gayon E, Heiblig M, Bourbon E, et al. Int J Dermatology. Published online 2021; id.15916.
- Khitri MY, Guedon AF, Georgin-Lavialle S, et al. RMD Open. 2022;8(2):e002255.
- Mekinian AM, Georgin-Lavaille S, Ferrada MA, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. Published online August 11, 2025. doi:10.1002/art.43287.#10.1002/art.43287
- Inflammatory disorders in IDH-mutated myeloid neoplasms: Characteristics and response to IDH inhibitors. HemaSphere / EHA article.#10.1002/hem3.70256