Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.
- Presentation
Challenges and Pitfalls in Patch Testing: Medications, Angry Back, Counseling, and Systemic Contact Dermatitis
Description
The talk reviewed common challenges and pitfalls in patch testing before, during, and after the procedure. It emphasized that active dermatitis on the back can interfere with results and should be treated or avoided when possible, since testing too close to inflamed skin can cause false positives or negatives. The speaker reviewed how systemic medications can affect patch test responses, noting that moderate-dose methotrexate is generally acceptable, while prednisone, biologics, and JAK inhibitors may reduce or alter reactions, so interpretation should be cautious. “Angry back” or excited skin syndrome can also create misleading reactions, so later readings, ongoing dermatitis control, repeated open application testing, or retesting may be needed. After patch testing, counseling is crucial: patients often remember only about half of their allergens, though structured tools like CAMP and written safe lists help improve adherence and outcomes. The speaker also discussed why patients may not improve after testing, including hidden exposures, incomplete allergen identification, or another skin disease. Systemic contact dermatitis was presented as a less common but important possibility, with manifestations ranging from generalized dermatitis to hand, perioral, or perianal disease, often linked to nickel or balsam of Peru, and sometimes requiring dietary avoidance. Overall, patch testing was presented as labor-intensive but highly worthwhile, improving diagnosis, symptoms, and quality of life.
View moreConclusions
- Active dermatitis should be controlled before patch testing because testing on inflamed skin increases the risk of angry back and misleading results.
- Methotrexate appears to have the least effect on patch testing among common systemic treatments, whereas prednisone is more likely to suppress or weaken reactions.
- Dupilumab and especially JAK inhibitors can reduce or eliminate some positive patch test reactions, so results on these therapies require caution in interpretation.
- If patients cannot stop systemic therapy, patch testing can still be done at the lowest effective immunosuppressive dose, with awareness that weak or false-negative reactions may occur.
- Angry back or excited skin syndrome can produce false positives, so delayed readings around 96 hours or later and retesting may be necessary.
- Counseling is a major part of patch testing, and providing safe-product lists, handouts, and CAMP resources improves adherence and outcomes.
- Patients often remember only part of their allergens, so repeated review of allergens over time is important because recall decreases as the number of allergens increases.
- Patch testing is helpful overall, with most patients reporting improvement and many recommending it to others.
- If dermatitis persists after patch testing, clinicians should consider ongoing exposure, missed allergens, systemic contact dermatitis, or another skin diagnosis.
- Systemic contact dermatitis is uncommon but real, with nickel and balsam of Peru/fragrance among the most frequent triggers and diet avoidance helping selected patients.
- Limited baseline panels can miss clinically relevant and occupational allergens, so expanded or customized testing to patient products is often necessary.
- Overall, patch testing remains an important and worthwhile tool for diagnosing allergic contact dermatitis and improving quality of life when performed and interpreted thoughtfully.
- Honda T. (2016) Contact Dermatitis. In: Kahashima K. (eds) Immunology of the Skin. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55855-2_20#10.1007/978-4-431-55855-2_20
- Sung et al, Dermatitis 2019
- Fowler, et al. Dermatitis. 2012, 23(6):301-3
- Sandler, et al. JAAD 2025 Jun;92(6):1383-1385.
- Patch Testing During Immunosuppressive Therapy: A Systematic Review. Dermatitis 2021#10.1097/der.0000000000000726
- Methotrexate and Patch Testing: A Retrospective Review. Dermatitis July/August 2022#10.1097/der.0000000000000852
- Systematic Review of Systemic Corticosteroid Effects on Patch Testing. Dermatitis Nov/Dec 2022#10.1097/der.0000000000000947
- Mainville et al Contact Dermatitis 2023
- Perez et al, Contact Dermatitis 2024
- Baltazar et al Contact Dermatitis 2022
- Janus Kinase Inhibitors’ Effect on Patch Testing: A Systematic Review. Dermatitis 2026 Online first#10.1177/17103568261415887
- Scalf et al. 2007
- Jamil et al. 2012
- Edman 1987
- Mislankar M, Zirwas MJ. Dermatitis. 2013 Jul-Aug;24(4):190-5.
- Salam TN, Fowler JF. Balsam-related systemic contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001 Sept 45(3):377-81.#10.1067/mjd.2001.114738
- Scheman A, Rakowski EM, Chou V, Chhatriwala A, Ross J, Jacob SE. Dermatitis. 2013 Jul-Aug;24(4):153-60.
- Zhu et al Dermatitis 2018
- Woo et al 2003
- Steuer, Botto 2018