Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.
- Presentation
Building and Testing Performance Measures: Ensuring Quality in Dermatology
Description
The discussion centers on the complexities of developing and testing performance measures in dermatology, crucial for ensuring quality patient care. The American Academy of Dermatology has established a Performance Measures Committee dedicated to identifying gaps in care and developing relevant measures. Current initiatives aim to align these measures with national standards set by organizations like CMS and other healthcare improvement bodies, focusing on key areas like equity and outcomes. The measured process includes rigorous gap analysis, collaboration among expert committees to draft and refine measures, and involvement from patient advocates. The measures encompass various categories, including process, outcome, and cost measures, each contributing to a holistic approach to quality assessment. Once developed, measures undergo peer review and scrutiny from CMS, involving a prolonged approval process often extending over multiple years. The measures aim to reflect improvements in patient care while balancing the administrative burden on clinical practices. Engagement with Qualified Clinical Data Registries (QCDRs) offers a path to specialty-specific measures, although these must demonstrate significance distinct from existing quality payment measures. Ultimately, the initiative serves as a framework for consistent and meaningful improvements in dermatologic care.
View moreConclusions
- The American Academy of Dermatology has established a Performance Measure Committee to guide the development of dermatology-specific measures since 2006.
- As of 2025, there are 26 performance measures for dermatology, with 18 specifically designated for MIPS reporting.
- A rigorous gap analysis process is employed to identify areas that need improvement in dermatology care measurements.
- The development of performance measures involves multiple workgroups, encompassing various stakeholders including disease-specific experts and patient advocates.
- Measures undergo extensive peer review and testing for reliability, validity, and feasibility before approval.
- The approval process for measures involves both internal review by the AAD and external review by CMS and the Partnership for Quality Measurement.
- New measures aim to align with national health priorities and enhance patient care quality while minimizing burdens on dermatology practices.
- Qualified Clinical Data Registries can facilitate more specialized performance measures tailored to specific dermatologic conditions.
- Abrantes T, Imbriano D, Reimann D, Sullivan J, Wisco O, Chan S, DiMarçe C, Gehret N, Grenier N, Imbriano P, Kahn B, Lizbinski. Performance measurement part I: Foundational knowledge for measure development. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024 Apr;90(4):681-689. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.01.054. Epub 2023 Jun 19. PMID: 37343833.
- Reimann D, Imbriano D, Abrantes T, Sullivan J, Wisco O, Chan S, Dimarce C, Gehret N, Grenier N, Imbriano R, Kahn B, Lizbinski. Performance measurement part II: A guide to developing dermatology performance measures. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024 Apr;90(4):693-701. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.02.069. Epub 2023 Jun 20. PMID: 37343834.
- Smith Begolka W, Elston DM, Beutner KR. American Academy of Dermatology evidence based guideline development process: responding to new challenges and establishing transparency. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 Jun;64(6):e105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.10.029. Epub 2011 Feb 1. PMID: 21281988.
- Report to Congress. CMS.gov. (n.d.). https://www.cms.gov/medicare/quality/measures/report-to-congress
- Quality Measure Development. CMS.gov. (n.d.). https://www.cms.gov/medicare/quality/hospice-quality-reporting-program/quality-measure-