Please login or create an account. If you do not have access to this content, you will be shown a 30 second preview and licensing options.
- Presentation
Aspiration vs Non-aspiration in Injectables
Description
The transcript discusses the debate between aspiration and non-aspiration techniques in injectable procedures, focusing on the safety and efficacy of each. The speaker advocates for non-aspiration based on personal practice, mentioning that adverse vascular events can occur regardless of technique, largely depending on the injector's understanding of anatomy. They stress that while aspiration may prevent some complications, it is not foolproof, as false negatives can occur, indicating a vessel may still be punctured without blood being drawn during aspiration. The speaker explains that waiting 16 seconds during aspiration does not align with practicalities in clinical settings due to patient movement. They argue that other factors, such as needle size and type, can influence outcomes and that relying solely on aspiration is not substantiated by evidence. Ultimately, the message conveyed is that clear aspiration does not equate to safety; clinicians should not depend on it alone for determining the safety of injections, and understanding individual anatomical variations is crucial to prevent complications. The speaker humorously acknowledges the debates that exist in the field and concludes with gratitude for collaboration in developing the presentation.
View moreConclusions
- Always aspirate during injectable procedures to minimize risk of vascular occlusion, despite its limitations.
- Negative aspiration does not guarantee safety; a negative result may still indicate proximity to a vessel.
- Aspiration may yield false negatives due to factors such as vessel collapse or needle position.
- Waiting for 16 seconds after aspiration is recommended to assess for blood presence, but may not be practical in real scenarios.
- Both injector and patient must remain still during aspiration, which is often unfeasible in practice.
- Using high G' materials can hinder effective aspiration, potentially leading to false negatives.
- Utilizing primed needles can enhance the visibility of blood during aspiration, but can also complicate processes.
- Larger bore needles may reduce false-negative rates but may also increase the risk of injecting into multiple layers of tissue.
- Cannulas are perceived as safer than needles, but they can still cause vascular complications.
- Understanding individual anatomical variations is critical for safe injection practices; rely on anatomy but recognize variability.
- Leonie Schelke, MD; Tom Decates, MD; Jonathan Kadouch, MD, PhD; and Peter Velthuis, MD, PhD. Incidence of Vascular Obstruction After Filler Injections. Aesthetic Surgery Journal 2020; 40(8): NP457-NP460.
- Goodman GJ, Magnusson MR, Callan P, et al. Aspiration Before Tissue Filler-An Exercise in Futility and Unsafe Practice. Aesthet Surg J. 2022;42(1):89-101. doi:10.1093/asj/sjab036
- Kim, Bong & Hong, Gi & Oh, Seung & Tseng, Fang. Analysis of Blood Aspiration Patterns during Pre-injection Tests of Injectable Fillers. Korean Association For Laser Dermatology And Trichology. 2020. doi:10.46738/Aesthetics.2020.1.1.22.
- Lin F, Goodman GJ, Magnusson M, et al. Movement of the Syringe During Filler Aspiration: An Ultrasound Study. Aesthet Surg J. 2022;42(10):1109-1116. doi:10.1093/asj/sjac032.
- Peng YP, Lin YW, Yang YY. Aspiration before tissue filling with hyaluronic acid-safety enhancement by using a lidocaine-primed syringe. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023;22(9):2457-2463. doi:10.1111/jocd.15759.
- Gonchar IV, Alfertshofer M, Nikolis A, et al. Complications after cosmetic periocular filler: prevention and management. Plast Aesthet Res 2020;7:44. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2020.133.
- Christian A Albornoz, et al. Aspiration Before Filler Injection: Rethinking the Paradigm? Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2021; 41(10):1124-1126. doi:10.1093/asj/sjab264.